Advice/comment on this LeCoultre manual wind (18k; 50-60s?)

Posts
12
Likes
1
Any comment on condition, authenticity, and desirability of this LeCoultre men's wristwatch is welcome
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php
attachment.php

Here's what I can find out:
  • JLC made for the US market: the LeCoultre on the dial; VXN on movement
  • K818/CW caliber seems to place this piece in the 50s or 60s (would serial # help? I read it doesn't with LeCoultre)
  • 33mm
  • strap and buckle aftermarket
  • is the crown all right? did JLC sign their US crowns back then?

I'd love to hear the community's thoughts on dating, originality of parts, originality of dial (it looks like it's not been refinished), overall authenticity, condition etc. Brutal honesty is appreciated!
 
Posts
12,687
Likes
17,143
Looks all original to me. Just can't see if it says "Swiss" at the bottom of the dial (it should).

Dates from 1960's. Bezel engraving is called "Florentine".

18K US cased LeCoultre watches are unusual, but they did make them.

Very nice,
gatorcpa
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
Looks all original to me. Just can't see if it says "Swiss" at the bottom of the dial (it should).

Dates from 1960's. Bezel engraving is called "Florentine".

18K US cased LeCoultre watches are unusual, but they did make them.

Very nice,
gatorcpa

Thanks, very helpful information!
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
I know Jaeger LeCoultre made many thin dress watches in the day (and still does), does this count as one of the thin models?
 
Posts
12,687
Likes
17,143
Not the thinnest model they made, but some of the thinner ones used the same movement.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
325
Likes
295
Just curious -- is that movement original to that case? It looks like brackets and screws that were originally around the perimeter of the case have been taken out, and the movement has two screw holes around its perimeter that are not being used. Or is that just the result of routine service and repairs over the years?
 
Posts
12,687
Likes
17,143
It looks like brackets and screws that were originally around the perimeter of the case have been taken out, and the movement has two screw holes around its perimeter that are not being used.
The screw holes were for case clamps which were not being used with this watch. A number of manufacturers started using what essentially were ladies watch movements in these smaller and thinner men's watches in the 1950's and 1960's. The dials had the feet closer to the center to accommodate these smaller diameter movements, but that meant there was no way to attach the movement to the outside rim of the case.

Of course, some ladies' watches used these clamps, and on those models, the screw holes were occupied.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
391
Likes
172
Though your crown looks a bit too large for the cavity in the (American) case, I just picked up a black dial late 1940s JLC with the same case/crown configuration