Evitzee
·Four pages in to this saga and not a picture of the refinished watch; was it expertly done, poorly done, something else? This forum puts a lot of importance on seeing pics, yet no one has said a peep about no images provided. I know the OP is upset because the nicks and bumps on his beater (his word) were erased but a couple of pics of the watch would add some context to the discussion. I don't see how getting a new case would have been the path forward IF the case was excellently touched up to a point where it is indistinguishable from a new case. Perhaps that is the basis for Oris saying they aren't going to get further involved.
OP says he's not ready to give up....to me that's a lawyer talking. At this point what is the OP looking for? A sincere apology from Oris, a new system that they have to follow in the future, a new watch, the service fee refunded, money for 'emotional pain and suffering', something else? At some point you have to ask yourself if it's worth going forward with more action. It's a beater watch, not a Philippe Dufour hand made watch. There is a difference.
OP says he's not ready to give up....to me that's a lawyer talking. At this point what is the OP looking for? A sincere apology from Oris, a new system that they have to follow in the future, a new watch, the service fee refunded, money for 'emotional pain and suffering', something else? At some point you have to ask yourself if it's worth going forward with more action. It's a beater watch, not a Philippe Dufour hand made watch. There is a difference.


