Community Stories

Accidentally left chronograph running on speedy 1863 movement

K
Posts
32
Likes
10
I started the timer earlier this morning and completely forgotten that it was on until about 6 hours later. Does it cause any harm to the movement?

Also, when I resetted it, it looks like the hour marker at the 6:00 subdial was a little to the left instead of being perfectly aligned in the middle at 12. When I ran it again afterwards for a few minutes, it looks like it went back to the 12:00 position. Is that normal?

Thanks!
Edited:
 
Marsimaxam
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,957
It is not an issue to leave the chronograph running for a period of 6 hours, it, does however, become an issue if you let the chronograph run continually as it will eventually run the oils dry and cause possible damage to parts.

In terms of the hour counter hand not resetting at 12 when you push the reset pusher, it's possible you didn't push the reset pusher all the way. If it continues to be a problem, you will need to have the watch serviced.
 
K
Posts
32
Likes
10
Yeah it was odd because when I was pressing the reset pusher, it felt softer than usual, kind of "spongy." Maybe I didn't press it all the way, but both the second and minute counter did reset. But regardless, after I ran it a second, third, fourth, even fifth time for a few minutes, it looks like the hour counter was back in the middle at 12:00.

Marsimaxam Marsimaxam
It is not an issue to leave the chronograph running for a period of 6 hours, it, does however, become an issue if you let the chronograph run continually as it will eventually run the oils dry and cause possible damage to parts.

In terms of the hour counter hand not resetting at 12 when you push the reset pusher, it's possible you didn't push the reset pusher all the way. If it continues to be a problem, you will need to have the watch serviced.
 
JimInOz
Posts
17,932
Likes
37,493
Marsimaxam Marsimaxam
.......become an issue if you let the chronograph run continually as it will eventually run the oils dry and cause possible damage to parts......................

Please elucidate?
 
nobbylon
Posts
85
Likes
156
Not 100% but I do remember reading that 1 small part does wear if the chrono is left running. I do know that it uses more power than normal as I’ve tested mine numerous times, leaving it running over night. Normally it takes 14 turns but with chrono function left running it needs 18.
 
Bp1000
Posts
622
Likes
2,845
About the worse it can do is use more power.

It’s totally fine.
 
STANDY
Posts
16,862
Likes
47,901
Have used a chronograph to time a 18 hour flight many a time. It's a Speedmaster that's what they are for ...... Timing Things
 
padders
Posts
10,438
Likes
16,317
You had a lucky escape there. Speedmasters have been known to become explosive when left running for 7 hours or more. Omega hushed it up but that is what actually happened to Apollo 13. They bought the Astronauts off with a Beagle puppy each. Oh the irony.
 
STANDY
Posts
16,862
Likes
47,901
My Snoopy stopped thread here we come....
 
K
Posts
14
Likes
11
The Speedmaster hour subdial goes up to 12 hours, doubt they would put that if it couldn't even handle 6.
 
w@tcher
Posts
296
Likes
1,119
I have tried to track 10 hours without any problem.
 
NT931
Posts
2,921
Likes
14,963
K k12123
I started the timer earlier this morning and completely forgotten that it was on until about 6 hours later. Does it cause any harm to the movement?

Also, when I resetted it, it looks like the hour marker at the 6:00 subdial was a little to the left instead of being perfectly aligned in the middle at 12. When I ran it again afterwards for a few minutes, it looks like it went back to the 12:00 position. Is that normal?

Thanks!

That was a close shave. You could've done serious damage to the space time Continuum. I'll leave the technical explanations to the good Doctor.

6a7eec3d08912658c79c1bc83ceb7411360895a8_00.gif
 
scubafan
Posts
57
Likes
54
Marsimaxam Marsimaxam
It is not an issue to leave the chronograph running for a period of 6 hours, it, does however, become an issue if you let the chronograph run continually as it will eventually run the oils dry and cause possible damage to parts.

Ridiculous. Where have you taken this from?
Edited:
 
Marsimaxam
Posts
1,430
Likes
2,957
scubafan scubafan
Ridiculous. Where have you taken this from?
It's what I've always understood and if I'm wrong, I am happy to be corrected. Could you please explain your position, thanks.

"But there are some things you want to consider before you leave the chronograph running.

A chronograph is a mechanical complication that needs the energy to operate. This energy is taken from the mainspring via an escapement. Leaving the chronograph means that the watch not only needs the energy to display the time but also to keep the chronograph running. This naturally means that if you do leave the chronograph running, the watch will run out of power faster. If you wear an automatic chronograph, you may not even notice this as the movement is wound by your wrist’s natural movements, but if you have a mechanical chronograph, you will notice that you have to wind it more often.

Another thing to consider with leaving the chronograph running is that since a chronograph is a mechanical function, it consists of lots of small parts. When the chronograph is engaged, these parts move, which naturally creates friction and wear on the parts. Now, the chronograph is built to be used, but similar to a car, the more you use it, the more frequently you will have to service it. The same goes for leaving the chronograph running. Leaving the chronograph running all the time will eventually run the oils dry and have wear and tear on certain friction parts that are subject to stress."

Source: https://millenarywatches.com/bad-le...ograph running all,that are subject to stress.
 
Dan S
Posts
24,232
Likes
53,963
The friction part is true, but other parts of the movement are experiencing similar friction whenever the watch is running. The "running the oils dry" part seems highly questionable to me.
 
scubafan
Posts
57
Likes
54
The watch moves at the rythm of the balance wheel, being the chronograph on or off. Stoppping the chrnonograph will not speed up the watch, nor it speed down if you start it. The only difference is that the watch needs more torque to move more parts so it eventually will stop a bit earlier because as the power charge of the mainspring decreases, at a point there will be no enough torque to move the chronograph hands.
Referred to the oils, well, all watches need periodical service an oiling. If you come to a point where there is no oil and friction occurs, all the watch will tear up some parts, not only the chronograph. Cheers.
 
Lurk41
Posts
478
Likes
490
Agree. The friction and the wear on the chronograph part will be higher if run continuously. But it is not a problem for the oil or the rest of the movement (except the reduced power reserve as explained above).

Now, some chronographs are (were?) better equiped than other for continuous running...

I do not remember which caliber it was - only that it did not have a running second - but after a year or 2 of production, the manufacturer started to repair under warranty a lot of watches, without understanding why they had so much issues. Then they realized that a lot of people were using the chronograph second hand as a running second... The chronograph part was not mounted with jewels, so, this behavior caused a lot of unexpected wear. They added jewels to fix the issue.
 
Faz
Posts
3,833
Likes
22,917
I let my chrono running like that and when I realized this, I had aged 50 years.
 
vbrad26
Posts
4,711
Likes
23,796
Some days, OF got me like....

GIF-despair-Star-Trek-GIF.gif
 
29 More Posts...
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

Kringkily

Omega Speedmaster Professional 3572.50 - Tritium dial with 1863 movement - just serviced

Kringkily Watches For Sale
Kringkily
Kringkily
Posts
1
Views
3K