Forums Latest Members

A well worn and used 1675

  1. obstando Oct 9, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    A 1675 (not all correct I know) that has had a hard life but looking better than I am on it :)

    DSC_0681.jpg DSC_0678.jpg
     
    marco likes this.
  2. sdre Oct 9, 2018

    Posts
    2,460
    Likes
    7,449
    Looks okay to me. Whats "wrong" or incorrect about it?
     
    watch3s likes this.
  3. obstando Oct 9, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    It's a 3.3M S/No. which means the Mk.IV dial is probably too late although I believe there are some 1675's in the 3.2-3.3M range that are recorded with Mk.IV dials so who knows? It may be OK but I mentioned it for clarity. The insert I am told is a later service insert (identifying inserts is my Achilles heel :thumbsdown:). Correct or not to me it's a very honest 1675 that I love.
     
    Pun and sdre like this.
  4. onthedial Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    421
    @obstando
    Are you the owner of this 1675?
    Re: the insert...you’d need a red back for this circa 1971 GMT.
     
  5. obstando Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    Yes I am the owner - I really like the insert as is but appreciate it is not correct
     
    onthedial likes this.
  6. onthedial Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    421
    @obstando
    Not period correct but aesthetically pleasing nonetheless. :thumbsup:
     
    watch3s likes this.
  7. mancio Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    884
    Likes
    1,274
    Well, for me it is a stunning watch.
     
  8. obstando Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    Which is exactly why I stated that in my original post and went on to explain what was not period correct
     
    Hunter87 likes this.
  9. Renton Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    296
    Likes
    1,080
    wow dial condition looks superb, and with bracelet nonetheless. a recent pick up? would start searching for a more faded insert to complete the look (just my 2c worth!). current insert should be a blue-back one?
     
  10. obstando Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    Thank you - not a recent pick up no - I have had it for quite a while. Insert should be red/blue. The bracelet is C+I
     
  11. jaguar11 Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    2,697
    Likes
    17,114
    I thought they were made to be worn. It looks great whatever the insert. Wear in good health.
     
    Larry S, watch3s, sdre and 1 other person like this.
  12. onthedial Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    347
    Likes
    421
    @Renton is saying that you're current insert is a blue back, whereas your watch left the factory with a red back insert.
     
  13. obstando Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    Haha - I read that as blue/black!! I am aware the insert is not correct as my original post
     
  14. jmazpiazu Oct 10, 2018

    Posts
    1,264
    Likes
    12,856
    I love both the patina on the dial and the faded insert. I would no really care about the non period correct insert. You have a great looking 1675. Enjoy it.
     
  15. obstando Oct 11, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    Thanks - I think the part of sharing vintage watches that I tire of is the pedants who want everything to be as it left the factory (if anyone ever really knows what actually left the factory). For those that obsess about increasing the value then yes maybe there is mileage in sourcing a part that is generally recognised as "right" for that watch but these are vintage pieces that for the most part have lived a life. That will almost certainly mean being serviced or damaged at some point in the past with some parts replaced. If the manufacturer or an agent has fitted a service part then that is part of the history of that particular watch and to my mind changing anything further down the line to enhance the "originality" of a watch is deceiving. I know that will go against the grain for many collectors but that is my view. My watches are worn - some are more original than others but they are what they are and I will continue to wear them and enjoy them without stressing that one element (that maybe only 1% of people will ever spot) is not period correct.
     
    Felice79, southtexas, marco and 5 others like this.
  16. sdre Oct 11, 2018

    Posts
    2,460
    Likes
    7,449
    Great truth. I'm planing on. 1675 sometime in the near future. As long as the price is reasonable and generally no major issues it's fine.
     
    gdupree likes this.
  17. D.D. Oct 11, 2018

    Posts
    81
    Likes
    62
    Nice watch.
    Its value has been increasing sharply too.
     
    obstando likes this.
  18. obstando Oct 11, 2018

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    Not during this thread :rolleyes:
     
    southtexas, Nathan1967 and D.D. like this.
  19. Enzo Oct 11, 2018

    Posts
    511
    Likes
    2,174
    Great watch :thumbsup: ::love::
     
  20. Tempus Oct 14, 2018

    Posts
    469
    Likes
    840
    It is a stunning watch and I don't think the service insert detracts at all (aesthetically at least) given that it has a nice fade to it.

    Hope it continues to bring you pleasure...Enjoy!
     
    marco likes this.