A Seamaster Puzzle

Posts
9,206
Likes
48,687
Ok, OF colleagues, let’s see if some of our resident Seamaster experts can solve this puzzle. Here’s a photo of a recent purchase. Looks like your run of the mill early 60’s Seamaster reference 14704, caliber 591, right? Well, sort of. The inside case back is stamped 914704-SC-61. The 9 is also slightly misaligned. Beating inside is a caliber 552! 24 jewels instead of the 17 or 20 jewel versions of the 591. SGR case. I’ve done some research and concluded that this is NOT a movement swap as there are a number of other identical watches that I’ve found for sale on several sites, including OF! Could this be a manufacturing anomaly or a limited production run of this reference? Any insights would be appreciated.
Edited:
 
Posts
9,206
Likes
48,687
I’m bumping this thread because I didn’t receive any responses and I’m really curious about what other members think. To reiterate, what’s up with the six digit reference and a caliber 552 instead of a caliber 591? I love the watch, just puzzled by the foregoing. Maybe it was a Monday morning production run and Omega ran out of 591s? 😀
 
Posts
48
Likes
138
Slightly old thread, but I have not seen it before now.

It´s a nice watch. I own a similar, also with "9" rather crudely stamped in front of the usual reference number 14704, and equipped with a cal. 552.

I bought it some years ago and first thought I had inadvertently bought a franken. As you mention, a 14704 is supposed to hold a cal. 591, not a 552. As far as I have been able to work out, the 14704 was the only reference ever being equipped with the cal. 591, of which only app. 60.000 were produced - all around 1960.
Apparently, the cal. 591 was developed as a less expensive automatic no-date caliber, intended for entry-level Seamasters. Being of same diameter, the 591 is slightly higher/thicker than the 552 (5.35 mm compared to 4.5 mm), leading to the domed caseback of the 14704.

Since then I have seen adverts for identical watches pop up now and then on the internet, albeit with some variation in dials and hands.

This has led me to believe that the ref. 914704 is not a franken. I think that Omega had a surplus of 14704 cases after they decided to terminate the production of the cal. 591. I think they equipped these with cal. 552´s instead, adding the "9" in front of the "14704" to distinguish them from the earlier production.
I have not been able to find any information regarding this from Omega. I haven´t seen enough of these 914704 to establish a period of production, but the ones I have seen so far all had serial numbers on the movement dating them to 1962. I have no idea how many were made, but I have a feeling it´s not many. Maybe one day I will spend the money and ask for an extract of the Omega archives.

Regards,
Woodward