A curious blend of materials

Posts
18
Likes
10
This example of the Omega Constellation 355.0814 is throwing me off. From what I've read the bezel is solid 14k and both the case and bracelet are two-tone, i.e. steel and 14k.

https://www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-constellation-omega-st-355-0814

^^Above link from the Omega site seems to show that this reference came in stainless steel with a steel bracelet.

If anyone has experience with this reference, please share your insight.

The gold in the bracelet certainly doesn't seem to be particularly substantial. Looks more like plating to me.

As always, thanks in advance.
Edited:
 
Posts
18
Likes
10
I can't say I'm a fan of the design, but I'm fascinated with fabrication and this use of metals piqued my curiosity.

Am I wrong to assume that this watch shares a similar approach to inlaid gold as the Seamaster Polaris?
Edited:
 
Posts
13,444
Likes
31,623
The Omega database usually shows only one of perhaps several different metals a given reference was available in.
 
Posts
18
Likes
10
The Omega database usually shows only one of perhaps several different metals a given reference was available in.

I see. Well, that helps. Thank you.

Does anyone have experience with this particular bracelet or watch?

How does Omega make this kind of two-tone? Very unlike anything I've seen other than the Polaris.
 
Posts
18
Likes
10
Here's the Polaris for comparison.

Does Omega use this same fabrication process for other watches?

Do other brands use this technique as well?

All I have are questions and some second hand photos.

My shame knows no bounds.
 
Posts
2,037
Likes
5,439
A while back I tried to extract a bit more information from Omega with regard to the manufacturing processes used to fabricate the Polaris cases and who actually made them. I suspect it was Lascor. Omega were somewhat reluctant to supply any information, mainly (I speculate) to preserve any trade secrets/processes that may be involved. From a cursory glance, I'd suggest that the gold on the Connie is a more thinly applied inlay on the case and bracelet and the bezel is a discrete part separate from the case. I could well be wrong though 😉

A bit of Googling unearthed this sales listing which appears to have some extra information. How accurate the information is I cannot say.
Edited:
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,647
Can’t say anything about that particular watch, but Omega did put solid gold bezels on both steel and gold capped watches in the 60’s and 70’s. C-case Connatellations come to mind first - 168.017, 168.019, 168.027, and 168.029 references. I think some monocoque Seamasters used solid 14k gold for the bezels too.
 
Posts
18
Likes
10
A while back I tried to extract a bit more information from Omega with regard to the manufacturing processes used to fabricate the Polaris cases and who actually made them. I suspect it was Lascor. Omega were somewhat reluctant to supply any information, mainly (I speculate) to preserve any trade secrets/processes that may be involved. From a cursory glance, I'd suggest that the gold on the Connie is a more thinly applied inlay on the case and bracelet and the bezel is a discrete part separate from the case. I could well be wrong though 😉

A bit of Googling unearthed this sales listing which appears to have some extra information. How accurate the information is I cannot say.

This is great info. I'm looking into Lascor and Fontana and will report back when/if I discover anything to add.

I agree, this inlay process must barely pass the minimum threshold distinguishing plated, filled and capped.
 
Posts
18
Likes
10
Can’t say anything about that particular watch, but Omega did put solid gold bezels on both steel and gold capped watches in the 60’s and 70’s. C-case Connatellations come to mind first - 168.017, 168.019, 168.027, and 168.029 references. I think some monocoque Seamasters used solid 14k gold for the bezels too.

Very interesting. Judicious application of gold for bezels with a minimalistic approach to the bracelet and case.