Here’s some hi-res shots of one I used to own. Granted, it’s a proof dial from 1969 and yours is a 74. There are subtle differences in dials over the years. Most of the shots of your potential watch aren’t close/crisp enough for me to say anything definitive, but it does appear in the last photo (which is nice close-up), that the inner-rotating bezel on yours appears genuine and that’s a good sign. Also, there’s a bit of lume degradation in the hands, which is also a good sign. Also, there’s a bit of lume degradation in the hands, which is also a good sign.
Click to expand...