It’s been suggested that the rotors with the circle under the word ‘watch’ are service replacements.
Also, a watchmaker once told me that the rotors with the less elaborate pivot point (last of your pictures) are from later production movements, whereas the more elaborate/raised pivots are from movements early-mid production. I don’t know if this is true or not but it’s what I was told.
Thank you.
It's possible. The serial number on the second picture begins by 3xxxxxx. On my constellation it's the same.
On the other it begins by 2xxxxxx.
Let’s be definitive where we can.
The ‘simple’ rotor appears on later Constellation movements - from around the end of the 60s.
If it is in an earlier movement it is a replacement.
Less definitively, it is now commonly thought that the circle symbol on a rotor defines a service part but to my knowledge there is no written evidence to prove this point.
Replacement rotors are not usually an issue with collectors but a simple rotor does look wrong on a watch that didn’t have one originally. ( mainly because they are not as attractive as the earlier rotor style)
Thank you for your reply. It seems to be difficult to have the truth but I understand, it seems to be a good analysis. But if you have to change rotor, I think you don't have the choice. If Omega stopped to produce the first style of rotor, you have to use the last, it's still a 564 caliber despite everything.