tag2012
·Hello forum, any recommendations?
Archer is not taking new clients. Nesbit doesn't service 321 in house...
Thanks!
Archer is not taking new clients. Nesbit doesn't service 321 in house...
Thanks!
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Nesbit's won't do it because it is now a Bienne-only caliber and they can't get parts for it.
That’s ALL 321s now, not just the new Ed White?
Nesbit's won't do it because it is now a Bienne-only caliber and they can't get parts for it.
Nor did I. Not exactly a huge incentive to pick up something with that caliber.
It's been a Bienne only caliber for a very long time...at least 10 years...
Soooooooo
So basically no one can work on these but the factory and someone like Simon T., who have parts and parts network outside of Omega? I had mine serviced in Chicago seven years ago, guess I was lucky it didn’t need parts.
Nor did I. Not exactly a huge incentive to pick up something with that caliber.
I tend to find a lot of people are very concerned with finding parts as the main problem with this kind of work, and it’s just not. Watchmakers might have access to parts, but they really need to understand how to correctly service a vintage watch. You can find a lot of parts that you will need on the open market, and most people can with a simple google search. But a true watchmaker who knows how to restore vintage watches will have the ability to burnish worn pivots, make and install bushings for worn plates and bridges, etc. So a lot of times - they won’t need new parts when watchmakers who are more ‘parts replacers’ may need them.
I’ll give an example. Here is a centre wheel from an Omega 354. A difficult part to find. Can you see the ring cut in it? That’s a groove that’s basically been cut in the pivot of the wheel. A new wheel isn’t necessarily needed in this case, we can burnish the pivot.
Here is the wheel after the pivot has been burnished. It hasn’t been cleaned yet so you can see residue.
Now, the wear could be too much so that the pivot is now too small and the fit in the jewel/bushing/bridge is too sloppy, but we would cross that bridge when we came to it.
Here is another example. The same movement had a worn barrel arbor hole in the bridge and mainplate. Here we can see how sloppy the hole has become.
A custom bushing is made on the lathe, the bridge is bored out and the new brass bushing is installed. Here’s the result.
The only other option in the scenario would be to
A) Leave it as is (quite common)
B) Punch it up (there are 2 ways of doing this - 1 is acceptable, the other is not, but the bushing here was so far gone that it could only be punched up the unacceptable way)
3) Find a new bridge - and mainplate as both were worn.
So I hope that helps to explain vintage watch repair a little better. This doesn’t really apply to servicing modern watches, but vintage watch repair is its own beast - when done correctly.
If it were better than the 861, they wouldn't have changed. But some people seem to put significance on some older things.