321 owners: How is crown winding compared to 3861 or Rolex?

Posts
78
Likes
19
That is completely fair. A vintage Speedmaster is still my grail watch. Either a 105.003 or 105.012-65. On balance
I think the 105.003 has the most interesting story and some of the most iconic images. It is also a good reminder of Ed White. There is an extremely sad photo of his burnt Speedmaster following the fire that killed him in Apollo 1.

If you want to get more inspired towards purchasing a vintage Speedmaster you should buy a few books:

Apollo Remastered - Incredible photos and interesting text on all the Apollo missions. Includes some shots of Speedmasters, in particular Ed White on his EVA, and of course Apollo 11 and 13.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0762480246?lv=shuf&channelId=500&plpRedirect=mhFallback

Apollo 1 in Photographs (and all following missions) - many photos I have not seen before and gives a really good insight into the build up to the mission. Quite a few Speedmaster shots including Ed White’s after the fire. Really sad overall, but an important part of space history.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/076437009X?lv=shuf&channelId=500&plpRedirect=mhFallback

And Moonwatch Only if you don’t have it already!
Great recommendations, thank you.
 
Posts
78
Likes
19
I found the 3861 black dial and 3861 white dial easy and pleasant to wind using the under finger trick, rather than fighting the crown guards by using my two fingers. The FOIS for whatever reason winded even better (don’t like the heavy lumed hands). Haven’t located a 321 yet.
 
Posts
81
Likes
118
I don't feel 3861 winding that bad. I don't have Submariner but have an Explorer (124273). Compared to 124273 until it fully winds, 3861 feels less smooth for sure when you wind the crown. However, I kind of like that feeling I am working a small machine. It never bothered me to the point some people say painful etc. Compared to 3861, 321 gives you a smoother winding experience. You could feel the elasticity of the spring in a more luxurious way, I say. I like both. Hope this helps.
 
Posts
492
Likes
3,444
Winding with a Speedmaster crown, if it's the proper size, is excellent, but if it is new or has just been serviced with new gaskets, etc, winding a 321 or 861 or 1861 can take some work. I've had many that were quite snug and not easy to wind. But I prefer it that way. I also have 321s that wind VERY easily....generally when they are 20 yrs or from their latest service.
 
Posts
7,062
Likes
56,493
It is all a matter of perspective. If the characteristic traits of a watch are going to dampen enthusiasm, annoy or leave a person feeling defeated then that watch is not for him.

I will happily put up with the admitted awkwardness of the crown guard design and the intrusion of the pushers on my 1985 861 because ... well ... Speedmaster. Winding it is still tolerable and is only a part of the experience and I am grateful to own and wear an example of an iconic, attractive, and very serviceable chronograph watch from a watch brand I admire.

Same goes for my 1957 Pie Pan Constellation. Winding it is only barely tolerable (heh) for me with my large fingers, but worth it because it is my very favorite Omega watch and one of my favorite watches of all time. Winding it to start it up is only the anticipation step into enjoying timeless vintage goodness for a day, or a couple of weeks as one chooses.
 
Posts
492
Likes
3,444
I reckon you’ll be hard pressed to find a more sincere, heartfelt discussion of watch crowns/winding.
 
Posts
81
Likes
118
It is all a matter of perspective. If the characteristic traits of a watch are going to dampen enthusiasm, annoy or leave a person feeling defeated then that watch is not for him.

I will happily put up with the admitted awkwardness of the crown guard design and the intrusion of the pushers on my 1985 861 because ... well ... Speedmaster. Winding it is still tolerable and is only a part of the experience and I am grateful to own and wear an example of an iconic, attractive, and very serviceable chronograph watch from a watch brand I admire.

Same goes for my 1957 Pie Pan Constellation. Winding it is only barely tolerable (heh) for me with my large fingers, but worth it because it is my very favorite Omega watch and one of my favorite watches of all time. Winding it to start it up is only the anticipation step into enjoying timeless vintage goodness for a day, or a couple of weeks as one chooses.
Agree!
 
Posts
2
Likes
1
I’m considering the Speedmaster 321 and would love some real world feedback from owners regarding the daily crown winding experience.


My reference points:

Rolex Submariner (modern reference): I really enjoy the tactile interaction of a Rolex crown, such as the heavy mechanical "pop" when it disengages, and that crisp, substantial, ratcheting crank when winding it. It feels good and makes a great sound.


Speedmaster 3861 (Hesalite): I tried winding a 3861 recently and was surprisingly turned off by the crown ergonomics. Because of the asymmetric case and built-in crown guards (I’m aware the 321 doesn’t have crown guard), I couldn't get a proper pinch grip on the crown. Rolling it from underneath with the side of my thumb felt stiff, friction-heavy, and awkward against the steel case shoulders.


My questions:

Ergonomics & Grip: How much of a difference does the straight-lug case with zero crown guards make for daily hand-winding?

Tactile Feedback & Sound: How would you describe the sound and sensation of the 321's crown turn? Is it a heavy ratchet, a soft mechanical hum, or a tight click? How does it compare to the industrial click of a 3861 or the heavy feel of a Rolex?

Thanks!
 
Posts
2
Likes
1
My reference points are the 3861 Speedy Pro Sapphire Sandwich and the Rolex 116900 Air King with the 3131 automatic movement. I purchased the Ed White new at the Omega boutique recently. My Ed White is significantly harder to wind than the other 2. The 3861 winds easily and the Air King slightly easier than the 3861. All 3 have buttery smooth winding. I contacted the AD and asked if this was normal for the Ed White to be stiffer than the 3861, and they said it was. The Ed Whites usually loosen up over time. They only have a dozen or so watchmakers hand assembling, and they build them within tolerances of lubrication, etc. I think part of the problem, for myself, is that I find the crown on the Ed White harder to grip than on the 3861. I can't explain why, it doesn't make sense without the 3861 lug guards in the way. The crowns are close in size and the chronograph pushers pretty close in distance, as well. I did find a simple solution: I slip a short piece (about 2 inch) of 1/4 inch ID rubber hose over the crown and now it's a joy to wind the Ed White. I can fully wind and the rubber will slip when I get to that point.
 
Posts
176
Likes
340
My 321 is from 2021 and I find it one of the smoothest of my Speedmaster's to wind, I noticed it from the first wind, it is buttery smooth. For reference, I have 861, 1861, and 3861 movements as a comparison.
Edited:
 
Posts
7,767
Likes
14,352
I wound my eight remaining Speedmasters yesterday, a new 321, a 3861, five 1861 based models and a vintage 861. By far the easiest to wind is the 321 which is five years old. None of them were what I would call hard or difficult to wind. The lack of a crown guard on the 321 makes it super easy to wind.
 
Posts
773
Likes
2,299
I'd say all of my Speedmasters wind pretty easy. Used to using the finger roll technique on my 3861, 1861, 861 with the crown guards. My Ck2998-5 is very easy without the crown guards. Each has a different feel but nothing which makes one significantly more a pain in the ass than another to wind.