Forums Latest Members

2 Ranchero's. Were they the real deal? - High res pics of watch 2 added

  1. cvrle1 Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    Didnt want to post these 2 while bidding was still going on, so that someone doesnt possibly get screwed over.

    Wondering if these were the real deal, all original as claimed. Comparing to others that I saw on here, it looks like both were original dials/hands, no relume on them. I could of course be wrong so I am hoping that someone can either confirm that, or let me know what I missed.

    Ranchero 1:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Ranchero 2:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Serial 169...

    Thanks for the help
     
  2. Steve1haggart Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    987
    Likes
    1,177
    I was in contact with the sell with regards to the first rancher wasn't convinced about the markers not being re-lumed here was his reply. Hence I never bidded the lume on the markers just looks off centre to me .
    upload_2016-12-20_10-12-19.png
     
  3. cvrle1 Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    Yeah, for that 1st one, I was thinking along the same lines. It looks like it may be original markers that shrunk, but I just dont have enough knowledge to be 100% sure. Also dial and hand lume look different color, so that is another reason i wasnt convinced.

    For the 2nd watch I just dont know what to think. That fuzzy lume on the dial always throws me off. I saw examples where same lume is original, and I saw examples where same lume was a relume. No idea how to differentiate between the 2 in that regard. Kinda annoying really.

    Thanks
     
  4. micampe Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    1,626
    Likes
    6,171
    Agree that the white one is hard to judge, pictures are poor and low res, but the white looks too flat and the step on the subdial is rounded, mine is sharper. But if it’s a redial it’s not the worst we’ve seen.

    The shifted lume on the black looks strange but it seems consistent in texture and color to mine, which was verified with a Geiger counter. The closeup is exagerating the shift. I think the main hands were relumed and the secnods hand was repainted, it looks thick and uneven.

    IMG_1813.JPG
     
    TNTwatch, luzer and cvrle1 like this.
  5. luzer Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    289
    Likes
    108
    i bought the first one, will post more pics...
    where is the 2nd one from? (white)
     
    Drawarms likes this.
  6. Vicke Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    455
    Likes
    769
    Isn't that what might have happened because you didn't shout out before the auction ended: Someone got screwed over buying a faulty watch?
     
    Edited Dec 20, 2016
    luzer likes this.
  7. cvrle1 Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    Shouldnt everyone do their own research before buying a watch? Ask 1st, buy 2nd. I wasnt 100% sold on it, and therefore didnt bid. How is it my responsibility to do research for others?
     
  8. ConElPueblo Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    Agree 100%.
     
    DIV likes this.
  9. Vicke Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    455
    Likes
    769
    I just thought your choice of how to not screw someone over was a bit strange. Who did you think you would offend?

    Of course everybody has to make sure them selves they buy the real stuff.
     
  10. cvrle1 Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    Not offend, but perhaps draw more attention to it than it had before (if that is even possible with ebay listings) Maybe someone missed it, and then they decide they want to bid on it once it was posted on here. Meanwhile someone else that found it by themselves now has more competition, and can possibly be outbid. That is why I usually dont post live auction links, unless BINs, as I do not want to possibly pump up the price and have someone lose out on a watch because of it.

    In the case of 2 above, I was curious to see if both watches were all original as claimed, so I waited till bidding ended, and then asked. Can never have too much knowledge about these things :)
     
    Seacow likes this.
  11. cvrle1 Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    Back on topic of discussion. Would anyone else care to throw some info on the 2 watches. I was able to fish out few "better" pics of the 2nd watch. Hopefully those help

    upload_2016-12-20_14-29-15.png
    upload_2016-12-20_14-30-12.png
     
  12. tdn-dk Dec 20, 2016

    Posts
    1,717
    Likes
    14,548
    Here is my white ones to compare.

    IMG_2968.JPG
     
    Deafboy, Tubber, cvrle1 and 3 others like this.
  13. Steve1haggart Dec 21, 2016

    Posts
    987
    Likes
    1,177
    the second on is to close to call with out better photos .the first one I just wasn't convinced by the seller . I picked this one up over 18month age whilst on holiday
     
    031.JPG
    cvrle1 likes this.
  14. cvrle1 Dec 21, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    Thanks for those pictures tdn-dk and Steve. I am trying to get seller of the 2nd watch to send me few more pics. Quite a nice guy (through emails) He said he will try, but cant promise anything. If I do get something back, I will post up here and see if we can get a definitive answer on all original or relume.

    Thanks all once again.
     
  15. cvrle1 Dec 22, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    So, seller came through and sent several high res photos. Looking at these, I am thinking it is original lume, but again would love if someone who actually knows what they are talking about to confirm

    IMG_4946.JPG IMG_4947.JPG IMG_4944.JPG IMG_4945.JPG IMG_4948.JPG

    Clicking on pics will open a super duper high res pic.
     
  16. 72c Dec 22, 2016

    Posts
    173
    Likes
    199
    My vote is for relume. Note the overspill in places you don't see on factory dials

    redial.jpg
    The hour hand is interesting too. I like to see a 'grainy' texture as good marker of radium lume, but this one has a flatness that points to relume. Could be lighting, but it's lumpy too.

    The script is a tougher call, if it's been redone like I suspect, they've done a good job.

    Here's a comparison with my black dial version that might be useful
    (you'll have to try and look past my scratched crystal ;) )

    redial4.jpg
    Check the font on 3 and kerning on the 'm's. Doesn't look quite right to me.
     
    Edited Dec 22, 2016
    cvrle1 likes this.
  17. tdn-dk Dec 22, 2016

    Posts
    1,717
    Likes
    14,548
    The mm. in "30 mm." is to close, i will say redone.

    IMG_0718.JPG

    IMG_0710.JPG
     
    ahartfie and cvrle1 like this.
  18. cvrle1 Dec 22, 2016

    Posts
    736
    Likes
    734
    Thanks so very much! Just goes to show how much I still dont know, and have to learn. Appreciate the help
     
  19. luzer Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    289
    Likes
    108
    hi
    where is the 2nd one from?
     
  20. luzer Jan 1, 2017

    Posts
    289
    Likes
    108
    here is a UV picture of the black one's lume
    more pics to come

    IMG_2740.jpg
     
    davten likes this.