1993 vs 1998 Speedmaster Reduced

i have a question on omega speedmaster reduced. is it always best to go for the older year? 1993 vs 1998? both are in prestine condition but 1993 has yellow lume plots and with papers and the 1998 doest have papers but is newer in year model and has the modern look. which one will you go for. I would appreciate everyones opinion 😀 thank you!

If you are considering a reduced, the model to go for IMO is the less common, slightly more expensive in the aftermarket Omega 3539.50. This version has 100m water resistance, sapphire crystal, improved clasp and does not feature the five minute scale numerals on the dial.For me, all of these are major pluses.

Same modular automatic chrono movement (about which there are many fish stories but I can say my experience has only been good, and I have owned two of these watches for many years). A lot of repeated “wisdom” from the forums not based on actual owner experience.

Of note, the L/R sundials are reversed on the reduced compared to the SMP, and if you look at the watch in profile you will note that he pushes and crown are not directly aligned, allowing for the DD chrono module.

I prefer the smaller size (6.25 wrist) and value the sapphire as well as the increased water resistance over the SMP, although I know many folks fetishize the exact opposite, of course! I also happen to like the polished center links on the bracelet.

Easily my favorite watch day-in, day-out in a small collection w Rolex, Zenith, and others...

Plus 1 here.