Forums Latest Auctions Members
  1. aps26469

    aps26469 Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    143
    Likes
    96
    Hi there all, I am looking at this watch. See pics below. I did some research based on everything I found here and great links from here.
    The watch is supposed to be 1967 which reconciles with the number (25.xxx.xxx).
    The dial is clearly original with nothing painted as far is I can see.
    The case I find more difficult, the facets are there as far as I can see, correct?
    The glass seems like once replaced.
    Buckle and strap far from original. DDC6DA4E-BE0F-4293-9CFE-43F70F021A23.jpeg 0395A678-07DF-428B-B8F4-A2D4A2F5DF21.jpeg DA61F702-2292-49A2-8416-FDDD2426CF82.png D9D3C85A-43A3-4807-8780-B738CA1242B3.png B5D548AD-C79F-4F89-8062-054A77E6BAA8.png Calibre 551 matching. HOWEVER, what about these two strange holes? Shouldn’t there be screws???
    4449CF23-44C5-43FF-8FA1-A5536A742274.jpeg
    Now the back, if I read the great notes from Desmond Guilfoyle it looks like this might be fake since the machine circles are not overlapping enough.
    What about the crown?

    All comments on fairness of this watch greatly appreciated!!!!
     
  2. Passover

    Passover Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    870
    Likes
    960
    For me this one is a clear pass:

    upload_2019-10-27_0-12-45.png

    Indices without inlays???

    Lines/scratching on the dial

    wrong crown

    What is this:

    upload_2019-10-27_0-16-37.png
     
    aps26469 likes this.
  3. aps26469

    aps26469 Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    143
    Likes
    96
    Thanks! What do you mean with the last picture?
     
  4. Lotus_Eater8815

    Lotus_Eater8815 Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    280
    Likes
    302
    Has the bridge been replaced ::confused2:: the wear on it seems off from the rest of the movement.
     
  5. aps26469

    aps26469 Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    143
    Likes
    96
    Aha. I understand. No idea. Will ask. All these vintage omega’s are new to me but I am now so far that I need to have a 60’s constellation next to a modern Speedy. Just a matter of time......
     
  6. aps26469

    aps26469 Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    143
    Likes
    96
    Back on the remark about the inlays. I assume you mean the black “stripes”? I kind of assumed this was also an option. Do I understand that these were never sold like this and the picture below would be the standard?
    BF8AABE5-589D-4805-A01C-79BFF9D97003.png
     
    Lotus_Eater8815 likes this.
  7. BlackTalon

    BlackTalon Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    3,458
    Likes
    5,171
    I'd want to see a straight-on shot of the dial in high rez. But I probably wouldn't bother due to the other items already flagged.
     
  8. Lotus_Eater8815

    Lotus_Eater8815 Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    280
    Likes
    302
    You need to bridge that gap with a 90s seamaster pro ;)
     
  9. Lotus_Eater8815

    Lotus_Eater8815 Oct 26, 2019

    Posts
    280
    Likes
    302
    They did, but they went together. Lumed hands = lume plots on indices, onyx hands = onyx inlays on indices, black paint on hands = black paint on indices, plain steel hands = plain steel indices. In your watch, the hands/dial don’t seem to match.

    [EDIT: actually it seems like somebody polished the black paint off those indices]
     
    Passover likes this.
  10. Passover

    Passover Oct 27, 2019

    Posts
    870
    Likes
    960
    Reviewing the pictures I think @Lotus_Eater8815 is right

    that on the OPs watch there has been painted indices and the paint is not present any more.

    Some paint left on 3 and 4...
     
    Lotus_Eater8815 likes this.
  11. aps26469

    aps26469 Oct 27, 2019

    Posts
    143
    Likes
    96
    OK, thanks a lot all of you. I learned a lot. I am going to pass this one. The picture of the other one (with the good looking black inlays) I found too expensive. I will keep looking. That in itself is also a hobby one could say. :)
     
    Passover likes this.