1966 14k Constellation

Posts
12
Likes
5
I have been on other watch enthusiast forums for over 15 years but my account here is new. I would like to discuss my Connie.

The serial number puts it to 1966. It's a 167.005 with a 551/1 movement. When I acquired the watch it was in fine condition. I handed it over to a master watch maker who performed a full service on the movement, lightly polished the case back to bright gold, cleaned the original dial, and replaced the hands. He felt new hands were in order since the old luminova was flaky. She looks like new and I wear it only on special occasions a couple of times each year. The case still has nice clean edges and the lugs still show the gold proof marks. The crystal has the Omega logo in the center. The medallion on the back also looks pristine, at least in my opinion.

I'll attach one photo here and you can see a dozen more photos here: https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjAFEdZ

What do you think of it?

Regards,
Chuck

2023-05-29_08-04-02 by Chuck Miller, on Flickr
Edited:
 
Posts
618
Likes
11,030
I don’t know anything about these, but yours looks beautiful to me. Is it yellow gold or white gold? With the yellow background I can’t tell.
 
Posts
23,539
Likes
52,326
Welcome to OF. The dial looks nice, not sure what type of comments you're looking for. Did you have specific questions?

As a collector reading your post, I can't help being curious about the original state. Any photos from before the polishing? And did the watchmaker return the original tritium hands to you?

BTW, people (including me) won't generally click on links, so if you want to show photos, post them here.
 
Posts
6,083
Likes
9,419
Also welcome @chuckmiller
I didn’t see your original post but I suspect like others my heart dropped when I read what you had done to the watch and I am too wishing I saw the watch pre-polishing.

It’s still a nice watch of course.

More photos would be good - front, back, sides are the minimum usually supplied - and internals if your master watchmaker supplied them when servicing.
 
Posts
2,973
Likes
17,522
Welcome to the forum. It’s a beautiful watch!
 
Posts
13,142
Likes
18,049
Polishing really kills these watches.

Here’s mine, also 14K.



You can see the beauty of the sharp angles in this particular design. Many times the softness in the case can’t be helped, as previous well meaning watchmakers already rounded them out.

But the market values originality, even if not perfect.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
7,635
Likes
21,906
@chuckmiller welcome to the forum, curious like others to see the before pics. The dial looks very crisp and pristine, was it refinished or simply cleaned?
Here’s a posting guide:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/vintage-omega-posting-guide.383/

Here’s mine, also 14K.


You can see the beauty of the sharp angles in this particular design. Many times the softness in the case can’t be helped, as previous well meaning watchmakers already rounded them out.

Wow. I don’t think I ever saw one that was so sharp. 👍
Edited:
 
Posts
6,083
Likes
9,419
There are one or two out there.......😀

 
Posts
12
Likes
5
It's yellow gold.

No, the watchmaker returned every replaced part to me except for the hands (mainspring, barrel, arbor, seals, original crystal). I suppose I should have asked for those. Maybe he kept them to use on another Connie but I didn't want them inside this watch.

My watchmaker, as well as the guy used by the previous owner believe the dial is original. All it needed was a light cleaning.

Any polishing this watch has received over the years has been minimal, just to brighten the finish. The crisp edges are all still there.

Don't fear the link to my Flickr album on this watch. It has multiple photos of the movement and side views of the case. The last 3 photos are all I have from when I purchased it and handed it to my watchmaker.

Regards,

Chuck
Edited:
 
Posts
23,539
Likes
52,326
It's yellow gold.

No, the watchmaker returned every replaced part to me except for the hands (mainspring, barrel, arbor, seals, original crystal). I suppose I should have asked for those. Maybe he kept them to use on another Connie but I didn't want them inside this watch.

My watchmaker, as well as the guy used by the previous owner believe the dial is original. All it needed was a light cleaning.

Any polishing this watch has received over the years has been minimal, just to brighten the finish. The crisp edges are all still there.

Your watchmaker should have returned the hands. I would ask for them. If you ever sell the watch to a collector, they will be wanted.

The case shows clear signs of polishing and rounded edges to me, and people accustomed to looking at these cases. Just looking at the photo you posted in this thread, it's quite apparent. But if you prefer the case to be shiny, that's what matters, since it's your watch. Different people have different priorities, but I think it's best to be aware of the actual condition.

Edited:
 
Posts
6,083
Likes
9,419
As long as you're happy with your watch - that's all that really counts in the end.

The watchmaker should return all parts to you - as they're your property.
What you do with them when you get them back is then up to you.
Did he return the original crown?

BTW - It's not just about 'fearing' a flickr album.
Yes, most of us don't care for clicking on random strangers' web links but it's also about the courtesy of providing photos to the members to comment on without them having to go elsewhere to see them.

Enjoy your watch
 
Posts
12
Likes
5
I have 27 photos in that album and as a courtesy to the members I'm not placing 27 photos to this thread. That would be too much.

The watch has the same crown it came to me with and from what I have determined and from what I have seen it is the correct crown and therefor quite possibly the original crown. As far as I know an original Omega replacement hasn't been available for decades and any 1966 Connie getting a new crown is likely getting an incorrect crown. Based on that I asked him to leave the crown as is.

The edge on the bottom right lug isn't as rounded as it appears in the photo you pointed to. No doubt that lug isn't as keen as the rest but it isn't horrible. Just now I tried for better images.

20230913_142952 by Chuck Miller, on Flickr

20230913_143006 by Chuck Miller, on Flickr
 
Posts
7,635
Likes
21,906
If anyone has an opinion on the value of this watch, for insurance purposes or even resale, please e-mail me to discuss it.
[email address edited out]

Regards,
Chuck


Is this a covert sales post? You’re not allowed to
post for sale without 200 meaningful posts, and posting an email address seems very suspicious, and frankly the MO of a scammer.

Even though quite surprisingly you’ve been a member since 2015.
Edited:
 
Posts
12
Likes
5
Is this a covert sales post? You’re not allowed to
post for sale without 200 meaningful posts, and posting an email address seems very suspicious, and frankly the MO of a scammer.

Even though quite surprisingly you’ve been a member since 2015.
No, this is not a covert sale. I am not offering the watch to anyone here in any way. Ignore my email address if it bothers you, post your words and opinions here.
 
Posts
12
Likes
5
And don't ever accuse me or associate me with the word scammer.

I have thousands and thousands of posts on other forums and have bought and sold dozens and dozens of watches elsewhere.
 
Posts
6,083
Likes
9,419
The watch has the same crown it came to me with and from what I have determined and from what I have seen it is the correct crown and therefor quite possibly the original crown. As far as I know an original Omega replacement hasn't been available for decades and any 1966 Connie getting a new crown is likely getting an incorrect crown. Based on that I asked him to leave the crown as is.

According to your posts
Crown before service


crown after service



Clearly the crown has been changed
 
Posts
9,553
Likes
52,766
Nice looking watch. My unpolished gold capped 1962 14900 says hello.