1959 Seamaster 2948 SC2 Help!

Posts
15,243
Likes
44,780
Too much to pay for an Omega with an obsolete movement, in my view.
 
Posts
214
Likes
188
Too much to pay for an Omega with an obsolete movement, in my view.

Agreed, I was never planning on paying this amount. I was more interested in confirming the crown was incorrect and when Omega removed the calendar from under Seamaster.
 
Posts
5,082
Likes
15,689
For posterity, 1500€ Is being asked for a 2849-2SC cal 503

 
Posts
214
Likes
188
For posterity, 1500€ Is being asked for a 2849-2SC cal 503


I agree the price is silly. That being said, I really like the Seamasters form the 50’s, but have been having a tough time finding one both in good condition and correct.
 
Posts
23,462
Likes
52,150
I agree the price is silly. That being said, I really like the Seamasters form the 50’s, but have been having a tough time finding one both in good condition and correct.

Correct, fairly priced, immediately available ... you can have any two of the three when looking for a vintage watch, but not all three.
 
Posts
214
Likes
188
Correct, fairly priced, immediately available ... you can have any two of the three when looking for a vintage watch, but not all three.

I seem to be running into this scenario pretty often. Immediately available seems to be the most common of the three, followed by correct and fairly priced.
 
Posts
13,478
Likes
31,754
It's seen a lathe and a buffing wheel, for anywhere close to that price I'd expect near perfection.
 
Posts
10,308
Likes
16,128
Too much to pay for an Omega with an obsolete movement, in my view.
Not quite sure what you mean by obsolete movement. Does this mean something ETA 2824 powered is superior to this and likewise superior to some old 321 chrono? The 50X movement watches are great IMO. Not this one, it’s over prepped and over priced but in general.
 
Posts
15,243
Likes
44,780
O_ B_S_O_L_E_T_E. No longer in production. Out of production for long enough that genuine parts are no longer made, and NOS parts have generally been used up. Parts difficult/impossible to obtain. More recent designs have improved greatly over this caliber. Hope that explains the meaning of the word “obsolete”! And how useful is comparing Eta models to this obsolete calibre.
 
Posts
335
Likes
999
Too much to pay for an Omega with an obsolete movement, in my view.
O_ B_S_O_L_E_T_E. No longer in production. Out of production for long enough that genuine parts are no longer made, and NOS parts have generally been used up. Parts difficult/impossible to obtain. More recent designs have improved greatly over this caliber.

Why didn't you post this earlier? A few days ago, I bought this watch (a 2848). Had I only known that the movement is OBSOLETE... 😲

 
Posts
1,616
Likes
3,857
O_ B_S_O_L_E_T_E. No longer in production. Out of production for long enough that genuine parts are no longer made, and NOS parts have generally been used up. Parts difficult/impossible to obtain. More recent designs have improved greatly over this caliber. Hope that explains the meaning of the word “obsolete”! And how useful is comparing Eta models to this obsolete calibre.

Some parts were recently made for those (rotor bushes for example), I found a few with barcodes in modern packages.

Also, the price would be OK from a dealer imho if : 1) the case, hands and dial were very good and not touched up / polished (collector grade) 2) fully serviced and functional and 3) maybe a more desirable dial variation. Every small defect would detract from the top price. Here the guy did not even bothered to source a matching crown, and the rotor bushing is full of gunk... this alone would make me walk away, or shave 1.2k off the asking price.

18_030-2.jpg