So, if all Seamasters are widgets and their value all the same, then why didn't you include this 18k rose gold that sold for $2,800?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/OMEGA-SEAM...072692?hash=item23c9e4d5b4:g:7UUAAOSwb9RdwNekPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network. The fact that I thought mine being a 1956, calendar, solid rose 18kt and not a Deville mattered at all (good or bad) is hardly a reason to get your panties in a bunch; perhaps it does not matter and all gold vintage Omegas are worth the same amount...but that is not the norm for other high-end watches and I doubt the norm for Omegas either. I have no views to "jive" with and hardly holding my breath on "striking it rich" with a watch worth the least amount in my collection.
Click to expand...