1954 Black/Gilt Dial Omega Seamaster Automatic - Reference 2846

Posts
17
Likes
49
X350 XJR sold this to me in Aug 2019. It's taken me a while to have it serviced (!) but it is finally on my wrist and feels... just right really. Snug. It seems to be a slightly unusual reference, so I'll try to organise a better photo. Been trying today to find out more about the 500 caliber, but haven't got much further than that as a caliber for the USA it was cheaper - and is less desirable than - movements intended for the Swiss etc market.
 
Posts
17
Likes
49
His photos were good at the time, of course, but I understand it is against forum rules to use them here. Give me another 5 years and I might even make it to 200 posts!
 
Posts
13,444
Likes
31,624
His photos were good at the time, of course, but I understand it is against forum rules to use them here. Give me another 5 years and I might even make it to 200 posts!

You're welcome to re-post my photos.
 
Posts
1,949
Likes
3,573
You're welcome to re-post my photos.
You do come up with some of the coolest vintages pieces. Hope you are well.
 
Posts
231
Likes
544
Nice watch. The dial looks identical to a 1952 bumper automatic Seamaster I have, but it's gone brown.

 
Posts
9,982
Likes
15,664
Very nice watch. I’d question the 1954 attribution though as The 2846 model is usually seen from 1956 onwards. The 500 movement has a slightly reduced jewel count of 17 to get round a US import tax. In practice I’d suggest it performs identically to the 19/20j 501.
 
Posts
231
Likes
544
Oops didn’t mean to hijack this thread. My watch is ‘52 from the serial # according to folks here. But I think you may have been directing your comment to OP. Apologies.
 
Posts
13,444
Likes
31,624
Been trying today to find out more about the 500 caliber, but haven't got much further than that as a caliber for the USA it was cheaper - and is less desirable than - movements intended for the Swiss etc market.

I've never thought of the cal 500 as being a poor stepchild to their higher jeweled brothers.