1950's Longines Question.

Posts
639
Likes
1,057
I know I come up with some bad pictures from for sale listings......and here is another.
Can anyone give any info of this watch from the one bad picture?
 
Posts
12,687
Likes
17,143
I can't even see what it written on the dial. Could it be "Quartz"?

'Nuff said.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
639
Likes
1,057
Seller text me a couple more, bad, pics. But the back is a screw back. 10k gold filled. The dial looks like a spider web and told that the bottom scrip is "Automatic"
 
Posts
13,437
Likes
31,601
Stepped bezel looks fine, I'd be more concerned with what looks like rust on the retainer ring on the back and severe wear-through on the lugs.

Unless you are buying to for parts I'd pass.
 
Posts
12,687
Likes
17,143
Case is missing the bezel. The wear through on the lugs could be a reflection of the camera. Pictures are so poor, I can't tell for sure.

I have a watch with the same case and a different dial:

DSCN2213.jpg~original

DSCN2218.jpg~original

I'd recommend a pass on that one. You can do much better.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
639
Likes
1,057
I have passed on it, but just thinking about the bezel and why it would be missing. Would it have been solid gold?
BTY, it was $200 for this and an old 1930 or 1940's Square Hamilton with sub dial.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,644
It's a gold filled case housing a 19AS automatic with a radiating guilloché pattern that's fairly common for the era. Nothing spectacular, and a parts watch at best as mentioned above.