Socks
·Hello all. Trust you are all well at present.
Would like opinions on this Seamaster 300. I’ve had a certain interest in possibly securing one of these for a while. I have come to the realisation that I couldn’t justify the expense of an original, and that I rather like the crispier look of the assembled 165.0324 ‘watchco’ iteration.
I have read a lot of the posts on here in my research regarding the assembled version of this series and at the risk of going over it all again would like opinions of this watch and in particular the legitimacy of defining it a 165.024. The movement is clearly 1960’s but I would suggest this is the only part of the watch, along with the caseback that could possibly be connected with that era. Also what is the reference SP2? I have only seen it applied to a 166.024?
I think what I'm saying is, does it get stuck between two camps.
Thanks.
Would like opinions on this Seamaster 300. I’ve had a certain interest in possibly securing one of these for a while. I have come to the realisation that I couldn’t justify the expense of an original, and that I rather like the crispier look of the assembled 165.0324 ‘watchco’ iteration.
I have read a lot of the posts on here in my research regarding the assembled version of this series and at the risk of going over it all again would like opinions of this watch and in particular the legitimacy of defining it a 165.024. The movement is clearly 1960’s but I would suggest this is the only part of the watch, along with the caseback that could possibly be connected with that era. Also what is the reference SP2? I have only seen it applied to a 166.024?
I think what I'm saying is, does it get stuck between two camps.
Thanks.
Edited:











