- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
Charlie Brown
·Hi all,
I have seen a variety of serial ranges quoted as normal for a 105.003. The below is supposedly from Moonwatch Only (I don’t have the book yet to confirm).
But on Speedmaster 101 the range is reported as smaller:
I understand that a large jump in serial number doesn’t always equal a large jump in date, but there is still quite a discrepancy.
Would this put watches between 2544 6xxx and 2655 4xxx in a bit of a questionable area? Or can it safely be assumed that watches in the 26 range are still likely to be correct?
Thanks in advance!
I have seen a variety of serial ranges quoted as normal for a 105.003. The below is supposedly from Moonwatch Only (I don’t have the book yet to confirm).
- 105.003-63: ~20,521,xxx - 20,526,xxx
- 105.003-64: ~20,527,xxx - 22,825,xxx
- 105.003-65: ~22,825,xxx - 26,554,xxx
But on Speedmaster 101 the range is reported as smaller:
- -63 2052 1xxx - 2052 6xxx
- -64 2052 7xxx - 2282 7xxx and 2208 9xxx
- -65 2282 7xxx - 2544 6xxx
I understand that a large jump in serial number doesn’t always equal a large jump in date, but there is still quite a discrepancy.
Would this put watches between 2544 6xxx and 2655 4xxx in a bit of a questionable area? Or can it safely be assumed that watches in the 26 range are still likely to be correct?
Thanks in advance!