1016: What does it really sell for?

Posts
419
Likes
184
So, would a matte dial be correct for an early 60's vintage? Assuming they're correct about the serial number and date. I thought these would all have been gilt.
 
Posts
21,894
Likes
49,689
So, would a matte dial be correct for an early 60's vintage? Assuming they're correct about the serial number and date. I thought these would all have been gilt.

Correct.
 
Posts
543
Likes
1,898
So, would a matte dial be correct for an early 60's vintage? Assuming they're correct about the serial number and date. I thought these would all have been gilt.

The earliest 1016s have a gilt glossy dial and a chapter ring. All these dials were made to be radium lumed watches so they just say "SWISS" at the bottom, but towards the end of the run the use of radium started to be more controlled. So you'll have exclamation dials and underlines, corresponding to less radiation and the use of tritium respectively.

They stopped with the chapter ring between 1963-64. Dials were still gilt/glossy for a few years, but these next generation 1016s stopped having the chapter ring. The watches in this generation were tritium, with the "SWISS - T<25" designation at 6. Though there are some very early examples from 64 that still have only SWISS but also have the underline, again denoting tritium.

MK1 matte dial 1016s started in 1967. These are commonly referred to as "frog foot" 1016s because of the shape of the coronet, and sell for more than later examples. Some MK1s also have really fat lume on the 3, 6, and 9 which is very attractive imo.

Here's mine, a late gilt example:

Mlmc1kp.jpg
Edited:
 
Posts
518
Likes
966
What do you know, one pops up just a week or so after this posting. Does anyone have a pointer to a good 1016 FAQ or guide? I'm a little bit concerned by a couple of things in the description:

Original matte black dial with aged tritium markers
Newer set of original serviced hands
'Frog foot' coronet
Original stainless steel folded bracelet
744 xxx circa 1961

Wouldn't a circa 1961 1016 have a gilt dial if original? They're asking $10K. It's a Mom & Pop watch shop, located in a rather dubious mall, and I'm skeptical.


i would STUDY this reference guide, put together by OF’s own @t_swiss_t :
https://explorer1016.com/

W
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,809
You should be very skeptical because that dial is a MK 1 matte dial seen from 1964-1974 and possibly from 1976-1978 but definitely not from the serial given (1961/62) which would have a gilt chapter ring dial with a MK 2 or a MK 3 gilt variant. It would be interesting to see between the lugs if possible

The dial, even if the case were from the correct range, is of poor quality and has been tampered with. Not worth near 10K
 
Posts
603
Likes
2,567
i would STUDY this reference guide, put together by OF’s own

@t_swiss_t :
https://explorer1016.com/

W

Thanks, W. Happy to help anyone with their questions a 1016. The one posted here has already been well assessed by @killer67 .

Generally, I see very good matte 1016s in the mid $10's, gilt non-CR's in the high teens to low $20s, and CRs in the mid-high $20s (assuming a glossy dial without matting). Add more for B&Ps/provenance.
 
Posts
189
Likes
178
I’d love to find a perfect example but have always struggled with their rising prices. I also love a self-winding Tudor Ranger so that would be a great alternative for likely a more rare watch.
 
Posts
102
Likes
540
Back in 2013 I could have bought this one for about Euro 1600. I was at the time even less familiar with watches then I am now so I didn’t dare buy such a small and expensive watch, even if it being a Rolex... Had I only known...

 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,809
Interesting that this watch during a pandemic can get $16,500 in minutes. The condition is very good but not excellent imo, attractive lume (though small piece missing in a couple spots) and a non-matching bracelet. I would expect a better example to fetch 20K and it would likely sell just as fast
 
Posts
419
Likes
184
It does make me wonder why we haven't seen some sort of reissue of this model in some form or fashion.
 
Posts
1,009
Likes
1,370
It does make me wonder why we haven't seen some sort of reissue of this model in some form or fashion.

They’ve made various updates to this model for decades now (it’s still in production now, having started in 1953).
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,939
They’ve made various updates to this model for decades now (it’s still in production now, having started in 1953).
Yeah, but the current Explorer barely resembled the earlier ones. Like the Tudor Black Bay 58 is the closest you’ll get to a vintage Sub from the Rolex family, the Black Bay Heritage 36mm is about as close as you’ll get to a vintage Explorer for current production.