1016-69 with mk1 ‘frog foot’ dial

Posts
435
Likes
978
Hey guys
All the 1016 I have come across in the past with this dial variation are from circa 66/67... could it be possible that this dial be original to a watch dating from 1969/70 with a 2.1m serial?
Thanks as always
Nick
 
Posts
15,172
Likes
44,550
You are permitted to post pictures, y’know! 😀
 
Posts
435
Likes
978
You are permitted to post pictures, y’know! 😀

More of a general question ... but as you asked so nicely...

I think I am happy that everything (other than the bracelet) is original so looking to pull the trigger unless anyone thinks there is a problem with a frog foot on a 1-69 / 2.1m serial
 
Posts
435
Likes
978
You are permitted to post pictures, y’know! 😀

Any input now pics up ?
 
Posts
603
Likes
2,567
Look at this -- https://explorer1016.com/matte/mark-1/

The hand lume seems very white and clean compared to the dial lume. Have you been shown pictures of the UV reaction? I'm suspicious those are relumed but it's hard to tell if it's just because the photos are really overexposed.

Also, don't think you should pay a premium for the box unless it comes with punched papers.
 
Posts
435
Likes
978
Yes the pics are over exposed. Have asked for more. But am meeting them with uv light to check the hands as I thought the same
 
Posts
435
Likes
978
Look at this -- https://explorer1016.com/matte/mark-1/

The hand lume seems very white and clean compared to the dial lume. Have you been shown pictures of the UV reaction? I'm suspicious those are relumed but it's hard to tell if it's just because the photos are really overexposed.

Also, don't think you should pay a premium for the box unless it comes with punched papers.
 
Posts
435
Likes
978
Yes the watch was purchased and all is correct... happy customer.
 
Posts
622
Likes
2,839
Lovely watch indeed.

Forgive my ignorance on these 4 digit explorers, was the Jubilee an optional fitment at point of purchase. I thought they came with large link oyster bracelets?