Forums Latest Members

Am I mistaken that the Seamaster 145.0016 should house a cal 861?

  1. Joe K. Curious about this text thingy below his avatar Jan 18, 2014

    Posts
    1,648
    Likes
    2,100
  2. ulackfocus Jan 18, 2014

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,974
    Good question. 860's can go where 861's go for obvious reasons, but should they is another issue. I'm having trouble calling definitive shenanigans on this one (well, meaning that caliber inside that case reference).
     
  3. Archer Omega Qualified Watchmaker Jan 19, 2014

    Posts
    26,464
    Likes
    65,607
    If I look up 1450016 on the Omega Extranet, it only calls out the 861, not the 860...

    Cheers, Al
     
  4. tomvox1 Jan 19, 2014

    Posts
    1,205
    Likes
    1,232
    Could be a back swap. What a funky dial!
    [​IMG]
    Overpriced but how often do you see this layout?!?
    Best,
    T.
     
  5. tomvox1 Jan 19, 2014

    Posts
    1,205
    Likes
    1,232
    Also Omega's database says the cal. 860 only came in the normal lugged 145.017 and not a "C"-shape case. But not sure how comprehensive that is. Can't find a web pic of an 860 in C case, though, only this case shape:

    [​IMG]

    :confused:

    Best,
    T.
     
  6. Northernman Lemaniac Jan 19, 2014

    Posts
    4,424
    Likes
    18,135
    I own a 860 DeVille myself. Omega only lists this in the case ref 145.017 and I have not found other (legit) versions. The C-shape looks all wrong, also the dial seems to be too small for the dial?
    The 860 is a 861 with only two subdials. It is slightly slimmer, and was only made in 10.000 units total, so compared to the 861 350.000 + it is quite uncommon.
     
  7. peatnick Mar 2, 2015

    Posts
    2,521
    Likes
    23,438
  8. Northernman Lemaniac Mar 2, 2015

    Posts
    4,424
    Likes
    18,135
    It is a Franken.