Zenith Chronomaster Revival A3818 in Titanium

ZENITH X THE RAKE CHRONOMASTER REVIVAL A3818 “THE AIRWEIGHT COVER GIRL”

Is this awesome or what (or not...)?

250 pieces. Not entirely sure about the polished centre links though...

It seems it hasn't officially been launched on the websites of Revolution or The Rake, but this page already exists:

https://therake.com/zenith-x-the-rake-chronomaster-revival-refa3818-cover-girl-12.html

Yes, prices are excluding VAT.

Speaking of the price, the price difference between currencies is quite big:

USD 10000 (=8815 EUR)
EUR 9700 (= 11000 USD)

I believe the price for the previous stainless steel Revival Covergirl was US$ 8100.

Nice watch and the titanium makes it even more appealing but the price seems too high

Hmm, a bit too boxy for my liking plus why does Europe always seem to get the raw deal on pricing?

Seems they have removed the page as the watch hasn't been launched yet. Think they will launch it this month though.

I agree about the price being high.

$700 extra for the titanium. Does it really seem high?

If I'm not mistaken the steel version was $8100 and the titanium version is $10000.

Some additional pictures I've saved to my hard drive. Sorry, Revolution and Rake 🙁

So it seems the only changes between this and the previous version are:

Case and bracelet material (now titanium)
Bracelet finish (centre links are now polished)
All printing on the dial is the same white luminous color (including the hour markers)
Rubber strap included (instead of the 2 leather straps)

it's 10k GBP to the UK ~ $13.5-14k USD so yes, seems high

Here is the text from the removed page:


Zenith x The Rake CHRONOMASTER REVIVAL A3818 “The Airweight Cover Girl”
$ 10,000

The latest collaboration between Zenith and Revolution & The Rake is the Chronomaster Revival A3818 “The Airweight Covergirl”. And this watch lives up to its name, weighing in at 78.2 grams, some 32.4 grams less than a steel equivalent. But make no mistake, this watch is no lightweight — in fact, it’s a fitting 50th-anniversary tribute to the barrel-cased A3818. It’s somewhat ironic that the biggest change — the use of grade 5 titanium for the case and bracelet isn’t immediately apparent, as the finishes stick to the looks of the 1971 original. But slide it onto your wrist, and the light weight becomes immediately apparent.

The blue dial also stands out.The blue-sunray brushed finish is called Superman blue, and with that red second hand and the crisp white dial details and Super-LumiNova certainly lives up to the Man of Steel’s standards. This watch comes with a titanium ladder style bracelet — a distinctive look originally designed by Gay Frères, made even more outstanding thanks to the highly polished centre links. In addition, it comes with a blue Cordura effect rubber strap.

And finally, don’t forget the El Primero caliber 400, a famous engine beating at 5Hz, capable of 1/10th of a second accuracy and offering 50 hours of power reserve. This Chronomaster Revival A3818 “The Airweight Covergirl" is limited to 250 pieces.

One more thing, apparently the dial IS different from the previous version.

In the titanium version the hour markers are the same white colour as the rest of the printing.

This is REF 95.A3818.400/51.M3818.

Ok, yeah, THAT is high...

This is live now:

https://revolutionwatch.com/zenith-...revival-a3818-the-airweight-cover-girl-2.html

I also wanted to point out, that at this time Revolution didn't mess up in how they represented the colors of a watch!
The last revival was shown in too toned down blue than in reality.
2020 revival left, 2022 right.

Thanks for the post! You are right, the new pictures seem to do a better job representing the colours.

Still nothing to see on the front page of either Revolution or The Rake, so is it officially launched or...?

Another thing to take note of, looking at the pictures the case appears to be polished on the sides. And the bracelet links also have polished sides (in addition to the polished centre links).

It does look this way that case has been treated differently indeed.

You think they committed the same error twice by accidentally releasing the info too early?

Seems like it.