Forums Latest Members
  1. RCAFBuster Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    Dear Forum,

    Many eyes make light work. I'm on the hunt for a Universal Geneve RCAF Single-pusher chronograph, like the one from Konrad Knirim's reference book.

    If anyone has one, or knows the location of one for sale, please contact me soonest.

    Thanks,
    RCAFBuster
    IMG.jpg
     
  2. LarryG not KennyG, not OG, just LarryG Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    992
    Likes
    3,836
    Tall order, worthy acquisition.
     
  3. RCAFBuster Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    Hi Larry,

    It is my 'missing link', the last manufacturer that I'm missing to complete my RCAF Collection.

    Cheers,
    Buster
     
    watchyouwant, genghis and oddboy like this.
  4. jordn Wants to be called Frank for some odd reason Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    713
    Likes
    2,011
    Unfortunately, that example from Dr. Knirim's book is a redial. I've never seen one for sale, but occasionally these casebacks come up for sale: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Universal-G...99838-6W-16-/171303912483?hash=item27e2824423Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network I'm a bit suspicious of their authenticity, but the ref number is correct and the engravings look ok. Good luck with your search!
     
  5. RCAFBuster Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    Hi Jordn,
    I agree with it being a redial, as it should be 'sterile', but the trick is just to find one.
    My watchmaker had a look at this caseback, and it is made up from a polrouter. Regrettably not authentic, eventhough the engravings follow the correct protocol. Bummer.
    Buster
     
  6. jordn Wants to be called Frank for some odd reason Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    713
    Likes
    2,011
    Interesting... I've always taken it for granted that this example from Sala's book was presumably a correct dial, but after a closer look this one is an obvious redial as well. Beyond the fact that it's not "sterile", the fonts are very inconsistent

    20150930_210017.jpg
     
    Florent and genghis like this.
  7. RCAFBuster Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    It is tough to comment with the photo quality, and black and white. The face looks a bit 'white' and the numbers a bit too black, where I'd expect a nice slight patina to both. could just be the picture. The hands look like the nice early versions I've got on Candino and Rodana models. Early pieces usually had the smaller pushers too.

    That said, I'd gladly take a re-dial example just so it would stand out amongst the others.

    Buster
     
  8. genghis khan Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    61
    Likes
    315
    Hi Buster,

    I thought you had them all, even the Wittnauer?! You need to 'sacrifice' some RCAF Omega's to this little lamb before the Universal gates in Heaven can open. I will keep my eyes open for your missing link, brother. Best, -Khurram
     
    watchyouwant likes this.
  9. RCAFBuster Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    Hi Khurram,
    I've only just landed the Wittnauer. I'm hoping that all of my 'clean living' will be enough to open the UG gates without having to resort to Omega sales, hehe..
    Cheers,
    Buster
     
    genghis likes this.
  10. timjohn Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,138
    Likes
    6,682
  11. RCAFBuster Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    I completely missed this one. does anyone have info on the sale house or who won it? I'd like to get in touch.
    Cheers,
    Buster
     
  12. timjohn Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    1,138
    Likes
    6,682
  13. RCAFBuster Sep 30, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    Thanks, I'm on the scent.
    Buster
     
  14. woodwkr2 Oct 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,366
    Likes
    819
    Other than your noted inconsistency with fonts, what leads you to conclude this example from UG's own archive is a redial?
     
  15. RCAFBuster Oct 8, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    The 'standard' format dial is the first one from Konrad's book, with just stick markers at the seconds. The one is Saba's book actually has a seconds subscale printed onto the dial. I've not seen another issued RCAF Chronograph with the seconds (numbers) included on the dial. I would also think that UG would only use one format across all of them produced under their contract.
    Buster
     
    watchyouwant likes this.
  16. jordn Wants to be called Frank for some odd reason Oct 9, 2015

    Posts
    713
    Likes
    2,011
    Hey welcome back! :)

    Regarding my comment about the font, I was speaking specifically about the numerals at the hour markers and how much of a complete departure they are from the ones generally found on RCAF dials and the fact that they don't seem to be up to UG specs. In contrast, the logo and sub-registers markings do look correct in typical UG fashion, but as Buster astutely pointed out, it is tough to evaluate this grainy black and white photo. Given my lack of knowledge on the provenance of this particular reference, however, perhaps it wasn't wise to say it's an "obvious" redial :whipped:. Is it possible that UG was just given some freedom to design their own dial?
     
    Modest_Proposal likes this.
  17. RCAFBuster Oct 20, 2015

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    Quick as a flash, the auction houses have failed to respond. So still trying to track down the consignor of the unsold UG.
    Buster
     
  18. DLF Jul 16, 2019

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    4
    I have one
     
  19. RCAFBuster Jul 16, 2019

    Posts
    675
    Likes
    2,906
    Hi DLF,
    Thank you for your message.
    I love to hear of the UG details, see photos of the dial, movement and inner and outer caseback.
    Sincerely,
    Buster
     
  20. DLF Jul 16, 2019

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    4
     
    A94D0A99-7300-4ACB-B893-1B4DB4EAC02C.jpeg 770A55B8-A41F-4507-81B8-FFDBC616B80F.jpeg 36FAD2F3-CA27-47FC-BEC7-00B7EB10B7AD.jpeg D912445E-6F0D-47C0-96A3-3FCFEA5E7F2F.jpeg ECF762E5-41BE-4D08-B70F-AFF393356EFC.jpeg 1BDCD5F6-4619-49F3-91F1-CF8273DB4CC9.jpeg
    Fish70 and Mark020 like this.