Why is the omega 2777-1 undervalued ?

Posts
287
Likes
428
Why is the Omega 53 TA 2777-1 so undervalued not saying it’s cheap but being an important link in the omega history and the predecessor to the railmaster, what’s your guys take ?

 
Posts
7,763
Likes
35,347
Because it doesn't say Railmaster on the dial? No broad arrow hands? Less well known than a Railmaster? The market is flat/down over the last few years.

There are many reasons why one watch is valued more than another. If I were to say one vintage Omega model was under valued then I'd say the biggest undervaluation would be to the Cosmic TDMP's which can still be picked up for the less than the price of a tatty 1970s Speedmaster.
 
Posts
23,022
Likes
51,470
I generally think the values are in line with other issued military watches of similar rarity and quality.
 
Posts
6,641
Likes
11,451
Because it doesn't say Railmaster on the dial? No broad arrow hands? Less well known than a Railmaster? The market is flat/down over the last few years.

There are many reasons why one watch is valued more than another. If I were to say one vintage Omega model was under valued then I'd say the biggest undervaluation would be to the Cosmic TDMP's which can still be picked up for the less than the price of a tatty 1970s Speedmaster.
You've hit the nail in the head about what I think are two of the most undervalued vintage omega models - TA and TDMP. I will add also that these are two models that are very hard to find in tip top original condition and those examples are similarly very undervalued as well. The TA though and its low valuation has always puzzled me because it has many factors working in its favor - modern size, military, relatively scarce, antimagnetic, railmaster precursor and omega brand.

There was a period of several years where I tried to purchase every single TA and TDMP in good shape that I could locate and I still keep an eye out for these models but now only the ones in the very best condition.
 
Posts
287
Likes
428
You've hit the nail in the head about what I think are two of the most undervalued vintage omega models - TA and TDMP. I will add also that these are two models that are very hard to find in tip top original condition and those examples are similarly very undervalued as well. The TA though and its low valuation has always puzzled me because it has many factors working in its favor - modern size, military, relatively scarce, antimagnetic, railmaster precursor and omega brand.

There was a period of several years where I tried to purchase every single TA and TDMP in good shape that I could locate and I still keep an eye out for these models but now only the ones in the very best condition.
Yes completely agree I was going off rarity of the thin arrow radium dial very surprised of the lower value, I see many that are messed with and wonder how many are bienne dials made to look like radium versions, the size and profile of the lugs are still today great looking.
Cheers
 
Posts
287
Likes
428
Because it doesn't say Railmaster on the dial? No broad arrow hands? Less well known than a Railmaster? The market is flat/down over the last few years.

There are many reasons why one watch is valued more than another. If I were to say one vintage Omega model was under valued then I'd say the biggest undervaluation would be to the Cosmic TDMP's which can still be picked up for the less than the price of a tatty 1970s Speedmaster.
I often think its just a popularity contest and actually glad they fly under the radar otherwise I’d never of found one if they were more widely known,.
 
Posts
287
Likes
428
Because it doesn't say Railmaster on the dial? No broad arrow hands? Less well known than a Railmaster? The market is flat/down over the last few years.

There are many reasons why one watch is valued more than another. If I were to say one vintage Omega model was under valued then I'd say the biggest undervaluation would be to the Cosmic TDMP's which can still be picked up for the less than the price of a tatty 1970s Speedmaster

I generally think the values are in line with other issued military watches of similar rarity and quality.
Which ones ?
I’ve never even heard of a tdmp so I guess that’s why it also flys under the radar
 
Posts
6,641
Likes
11,451
Ah yes I do know those, but are they rare ?
Uncommon overall but just as hard to find in excellent condition as it is to find TAs with unblemished dials. To wit:

 
Posts
287
Likes
428
Uncommon overall but just as hard to find in excellent condition as it is to find TAs with unblemished dials. To wit:

Very nice indeed, very pretty moon phase and nice to see another original TA thanks for sharing those
 
Posts
23,022
Likes
51,470
Which ones ?
I’ve never even heard of a tdmp so I guess that’s why it also flys under the radar
I guess we could quibble about whether these should be worth more or less, but valuation is arbitrary and makes for tiresome discussion. So many watches sell for head-scratching prices, who can say why.

But I really don't think these are flying under the radar, they are both highly sought after. Any vintage Omega that sells for more than $5k is a very desirable watch, IMO.

They don't come to market in good condition very often, so new enthusiasts may not always be aware of them. But when one comes to market, it brings good money, they are very desirable to collectors, and sell for more than plenty of watches that are more rare.
 
Posts
749
Likes
1,287
Are they undervalued? I think it is such a subjective statement with so many personal preferences in play for each individual watch that it is imponderable, and simply comes down to individual, personal buying decisions related to each individual watch, at a certain point in time.

It is a decent, middle market mvt military 3 hander. There are quite a variety of those around, personally, I prefer a JLC Mk11 as it has a better, more historically interesting (to me) movement. Within the 53's, those for the NZ or Australian airforce are probably fewer on the ground than even a nice TA, yet don't make quite the same prices, strangely, in my opinion. I have a white dialled '53 that might be an MoD redial, or might be a civilian redial, no one knows for sure but I probably prefer it to a nice TA.

I think the classic, original TA has had quite a bit of 'low level hype' on forums over the decades and somewhat of a myth has been created, and it is a very attractive watch, perhaps it's perceived 'value' lies in those factors. YMMV.
 
Posts
287
Likes
428
Are they undervalued? I think it is such a subjective statement with so many personal preferences in play for each individual watch that it is imponderable, and simply comes down to individual, personal buying decisions related to each individual watch, at a certain point in time.

It is a decent, middle market mvt military 3 hander. There are quite a variety of those around, personally, I prefer a JLC Mk11 as it has a better, more historically interesting (to me) movement. Within the 53's, those for the NZ or Australian airforce are probably fewer on the ground than even a nice TA, yet don't make quite the same prices, strangely, in my opinion. I have a white dialled '53 that might be an MoD redial, or might be a civilian redial, no one knows for sure but I probably prefer it to a nice TA.

I think the classic, original TA has had quite a bit of 'low level hype' on forums over the decades and somewhat of a myth has been created, and it is a very attractive watch, perhaps it's perceived 'value' lies in those factors. YMMV.
It’s really good to see others opinions on the subject and it’s just very interesting all the factors, thanks for sharing guys