What is wrong with #2? Don't you like paintings? I could spend days in a museum.
I like some art, I can appreciate the great skill, effort and genius involved in creating it (where skill, effort and genius is actually used to create it, these days, much of what we are being told is art is utter bollocks)
Someone nailing a mouldy fish head to the wall of a gallery isn't an artist in my book, unless of course you include a bullshit artist in your definition of artist.
Some modern art is just a cynical con fest, of bullshit, on the other hand some modern art is absolutely striking and magnificent, but most of it is rubbish. I s'pose there was a hell of a lot of rubbish about in the classical era too but over time most of that ended up in the rubbish dump where it belonged. Unfortunately the rubbish amongst the modern stuff hasn't had sufficient time for the attrition rate to have taken its toll yet!
I can go to a gallery or a museum to see it, I don't have to spend good money to buy it at inflated prices.
Investment potential aside, there is not a lot you can do with art beyond it's decorative aesthetic.
And sadly the values of the best pieces is so great that a lot of it in private hands is hidden away in vaults so it can't even perform it's primary function of being seen to be appreciated.
Where as a collection of cars, boats, planes, antique furniture, guns or watches etc. can not only be beautiful, but fun to use and be practical to varying degrees, these items are more hands on, just looking at them on display is not enough to get the full enjoyment potential from them, though for most of us we have to settle for just looking at them, though sometimes we can get lucky and to see and hear something like a classic car or plane etc. being used either out in the wild or at an event.