Which one would you recommend?

Posts
10
Likes
1
My local watch seller is selling these for 400$ , which one would you recommend getting and why? I don't know much about Omega watches
 
Posts
29,744
Likes
35,705
All are gold plated or filled with rough cases, not worth it, better to shop around here or ebay
 
Posts
6,244
Likes
25,990
If you’re itching to spend $400, you can have a look through this thread. Just skip to the end where the most recent posts are.
 
Posts
7,320
Likes
58,219
To add a little context, gold and gold plated watches were a little more popular forty years+ ago, when many of us wore suits and ties to work and shirtsleeves were rolled down and fastened with cuff links.

The present 'dress down' styles include bigger, sportier watches that have resulted in gold and gp watches looking a bit dated.

So, nowadays, most vintage collectors/wearers enjoy stainless sleel cases which don’t tarnish, wear well with jeans or suits and fit nicely on those of us with skinny wrists.

Factor in that gp can wear off, that all these watches probably need a $200 dollar service you can see they’re not an investment and quite possibly a money pit.

Obviously, Omega is a quality brand and movement and, if you’re really keen on these, and bearing in mind what I’ve posted, go in the shop, try them on, make sure they run accurately and if you really like any of them, see if the seller will knock off $50-100, but be prepared to walk away.
 
Posts
217
Likes
171
Roymcroy,
If you are spending $400 it is not really an investment but you should want to buy a watch which will retain its value.
I therefore suggest that you buy an Omega or Longines watch as the brands are trusted.,
Some watches may be automatic and some manual wind. Will you wind your watch every day? I do!
Look at the crowns .... if it looks right then ok.
I wouldn't touch the square Omega.
1950 and 1960's watches tend to have a smaller diameter. If you have small or medium wrist size then this isn't an issue.
Personally I like photo 1.

Having said all that. You can maybe pick up a solid gold Longines manual calatrava style watch for that figure. It depends on what you consider as style?
 
Posts
11,351
Likes
19,909
The point around the current popularity and pitfalls of gold plate are true, but a greater issue with these examples is the condition seems to be poor. It’s hard to see details and be specific as it looks like the photos were taken from two feet away but overall they look worn, with soft cases, base metal underneath coming through, stained dials and perhaps a crack on one of the lugs.

Like many, I have no interested in gold filled/plated, it’s either stainless (or given the ‘value’ compared to actual gold price, I’d go with a solid gold vintage Omegas from this period if I wanted gold), but if you do want gold plate as a compromise, take your time and get one with a good, sharp case, paying particular attention to the lugs to make sure the plate hasn’t worn away
 
Posts
217
Likes
171
Wait until you see something that really calls to you. E.g. I bought this watch for GBP192 two years ago because I liked it. I have worn it out and about. No problems at all.
Gold manual watch presented to someone retiring at Bristol Siddley Engines Ltd in 1964.

 
Posts
10
Likes
1
Wait until you see something that really calls to you. E.g. I bought this watch for GBP192 two years ago because I liked it. I have worn it out and about. No problems at all.
Gold manual watch presented to someone retiring at Bristol Siddley Engines Ltd in 1964.

That's a really nice watch, congratulations.
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
If you’re itching to spend $400, you can have a look through this thread. Just skip to the end where the most recent posts are.
I can't, I live in Turkey, can't buy goods for more than 30€ otherwise they'll get returned and stuff. It just happened to me with a universal geneve.
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
The point around the current popularity and pitfalls of gold plate are true, but a greater issue with these examples is the condition seems to be poor. It’s hard to see details and be specific as it looks like the photos were taken from two feet away but overall they look worn, with soft cases, base metal underneath coming through, stained dials and perhaps a crack on one of the lugs.

Like many, I have no interested in gold filled/plated, it’s either stainless (or given the ‘value’ compared to actual gold price, I’d go with a solid gold vintage Omegas from this period if I wanted gold), but if you do want gold plate as a compromise, take your time and get one with a good, sharp case, paying particular attention to the lugs to make sure the plate hasn’t worn away
Yeah you're right, thank you. Problem is my options are limited here, it's hard to buy from abroad.
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
Roymcroy,
If you are spending $400 it is not really an investment but you should want to buy a watch which will retain its value.
I therefore suggest that you buy an Omega or Longines watch as the brands are trusted.,
Some watches may be automatic and some manual wind. Will you wind your watch every day? I do!
Look at the crowns .... if it looks right then ok.
I wouldn't touch the square Omega.
1950 and 1960's watches tend to have a smaller diameter. If you have small or medium wrist size then this isn't an issue.
Personally I like photo 1.

Having said all that. You can maybe pick up a solid gold Longines manual calatrava style watch for that figure. It depends on what you consider as style?
Can you please give me a few specific models to take into consideration or get?
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
To add a little context, gold and gold plated watches were a little more popular forty years+ ago, when many of us wore suits and ties to work and shirtsleeves were rolled down and fastened with cuff links.

The present 'dress down' styles include bigger, sportier watches that have resulted in gold and gp watches looking a bit dated.

So, nowadays, most vintage collectors/wearers enjoy stainless sleel cases which don’t tarnish, wear well with jeans or suits and fit nicely on those of us with skinny wrists.

Factor in that gp can wear off, that all these watches probably need a $200 dollar service you can see they’re not an investment and quite possibly a money pit.

Obviously, Omega is a quality brand and movement and, if you’re really keen on these, and bearing in mind what I’ve posted, go in the shop, try them on, make sure they run accurately and if you really like any of them, see if the seller will knock off $50-100, but be prepared to walk away.
You're right, but also to be fair the guy recently serviced them, he's my main watch repair guy. He always repairs my watches for around 10$ , so that's why.

He offered me a Rolex oyster perpetual from around the 1940's or 50's for 2000$
 
Posts
9,561
Likes
15,073
You're right, but also to be fair the guy recently serviced them, he's my main watch repair guy. He always repairs my watches for around 10$ , so that's why.

He offered me a Rolex oyster perpetual from around the 1940's or 50's for 2000$
A watch service that costs $10 is likely worth exactly that...
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
A watch service that costs $10 is likely worth exactly that...
I mean not really, he does it very cheaply for me because we are friends and all. Also servicing watches here is pretty cheap, the watches are so expensive though.
 
Posts
53
Likes
63
My local watch seller is selling these for 400$ , which one would you recommend getting and why? I don't know much about Omega watches
I prefer option 1, seems like from the 50s or early 60s, others are probably younger, late 60s to late 70s

do you have photos of movement?
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
I prefer option 1, seems like from the 50s or early 60s, others are probably younger, late 60s to late 70s

do you have photos of movement?
No, but I can go and take photos. Is it okay if I send it next week? I have an exam next week, hopefully my last.
 
Posts
10
Likes
1
I prefer option 1, seems like from the 50s or early 60s, others are probably younger, late 60s to late 70s

do you have photos of movement?




I ended up getting this instead for 300$