- Posts
- 6,568
- Likes
- 21,256
M'Bob
·The house is $8,000 cheaper:
$520,000
$528,000
$520,000
$528,000
Which of these two would you choose?
- Posts
- 667
- Likes
- 2,285
vintage hab
·Depends on condition, condition, condition 😉
- Posts
- 2,354
- Likes
- 4,685
Charlemagne1333
·The house.
But only if it comes with box and papers…
But only if it comes with box and papers…
- Posts
- 2,058
- Likes
- 4,356
Fallout Boy
·w.m.t. well made treasure 😝 $520.00
- Posts
- 37
- Likes
- 93
BeauW
·Pretty crazy when you put it into visual perspective like that!!
If I had that kind of money burning a hole in my pocket I'd go with the watch. Easier to clean, lower cost of ownership, and mobile!
If I had that kind of money burning a hole in my pocket I'd go with the watch. Easier to clean, lower cost of ownership, and mobile!
- Posts
- 2,024
- Likes
- 7,141
MTROIS
·Depends on condition, condition, condition 😉
- Posts
- 323
- Likes
- 225
myatt
·I'd get the Rolex; no property taxes, no maintenance and much higher appreciation potential in that condition - with a potential for a private overseas deal to boot!
- Posts
- 963
- Likes
- 1,250
- Posts
- 323
- Likes
- 225
myatt
·
- Posts
- 5,019
- Likes
- 15,314
eugeneandresson
·Definitely the house…the watch looks like a Freese101…much better watch…much cheaper too…
- Posts
- 2,972
- Likes
- 7,801
blufinz52
··Hears dead people, not watch rotors.I'd get the house and invite 25 of my closest OF friends for a G2G!
- Posts
- 864
- Likes
- 3,582
TheGreekPhysique
·Which one is UNTOUCHED?
- Posts
- 1,607
- Likes
- 5,032
flw
··history nerdThe house. The inside of a watch case, even a Rolex dive watch, is a bit cramped.
- Posts
- 274
- Likes
- 266
- Posts
- 27,244
- Likes
- 69,458
