Forums Latest Members
  1. watchknut New watch + Instagram + wife = dumbass Jun 30, 2017

    Posts
    4,025
    Likes
    13,790
  2. arcadelt Jun 30, 2017

    Posts
    1,038
    Likes
    1,299
    Wrong dial.
     
  3. alam Jun 30, 2017

    Posts
    8,095
    Likes
    18,682
    if so, then off the chart! :)
     
    Mark020 likes this.
  4. Taddyangle Convicted Invicta Wearer Jun 30, 2017

    Posts
    4,820
    Likes
    31,399
    And Chrono hand.
     
  5. arcadelt Jun 30, 2017

    Posts
    1,038
    Likes
    1,299
    Write up says that movement is four years newer than the case, so begs the question whether this watch was put together from parts. Based on Speedmaster101, $15000 minus dial, minus hands, minus movement, so perhaps [well] less than $10K?
     
  6. 77deluxe Jun 30, 2017

    Posts
    2,058
    Likes
    4,613
    Parts watch. So subtract the value of disingenuousness. Is disingenuousness even a word? A = case value + "E" for effort.
     
    wkimmd likes this.
  7. davten Jul 1, 2017

    Posts
    201
    Likes
    1,417
    I shouldn't let it annoy me but it does. I think it's cos I feel sorry for a novice that might pay that price.
     
  8. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jul 1, 2017

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    HQM have a history of offering cobbled together speedmasters as well as very good ones. I have two 2998's from them that are in the "Never Sell" cupboard.

    The OP watch is an assembly. As such there is no place for it on the chart.

    I have always regarded HQM as an honest trading company who often offer goods on consignment, perhaps from people who also don't know what is right and what is wrong on a speedmaster. I think of them as providing me a very large flow of watches to choose from, bigger and broader than any other single source. Because of this huge volume of choice, I accept that they do not scrutinize their goods closely. I also think this gives me a chance to get a good watch cheap - because they don't spot those either.

    The OP watch is a parts watch. It cannot be valued as a 105.003......because it is not one.
     
    jimmyd13, Traveler, lando and 10 others like this.
  9. watchknut New watch + Instagram + wife = dumbass Jul 1, 2017

    Posts
    4,025
    Likes
    13,790
    @Spacefruit I just find it a bit odd that they have a cobbled together Ed White with a movt that they say is 4 years newer than the case...and a dial that is totally wrong.

    I have always respected them as well, but not having full disclosure on this one and asking that money seems a bit off to me.

    They know it is incorrect, yet choose to have it described in such poor terms.

    Imagine if someone described that watch as such on here and asked that price? They would be hand eviscerated like a chicken.

    Just my 2 cents.
     
    flame, Kmart, cristos71 and 4 others like this.
  10. KJH666 Jul 2, 2017

    Posts
    289
    Likes
    262
    I suppose there is a market for watches with replacement parts for those who perhaps cannot afford the real thing. The issue here is that the price being asked is consistent with the Watch being correct, which it clearly is not.

    The watch does have some attractions, the applied Omega logo, the don insert, the stepped dial and yes it is even pre-moon, but anyone buying a 105.003 wants it to be pre-professional as well.

    At $10k it would look a more attractive proposition.
     
  11. Fost Jul 2, 2017

    Posts
    2,052
    Likes
    5,839
    Asking price and selling price can be very different when dealing with Jacek... But anyway not for me
     
    wsfarrell likes this.
  12. Kmart Jul 2, 2017

    Posts
    1,228
    Likes
    3,770
    Always good to keep this in mind, I was suprised at how flexible they were willing to be on pricing.
     
  13. Fost Jul 2, 2017

    Posts
    2,052
    Likes
    5,839
    First things they told me after entering the shop, 'forget about the prices on our website!' :)
     
  14. wkimmd Jul 3, 2017

    Posts
    518
    Likes
    959
    I have to say though, as one of the biggest and well known purveyors on vintage pieces...yikes...
     
  15. Mark020 not the sharpest pencil in the ΩF drawer Jul 3, 2017

    Posts
    4,736
    Likes
    6,740
    Well why yikes? Described as it is so who cares? It is what is
     
  16. Spacefruit Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Jul 3, 2017

    Posts
    5,201
    Likes
    23,016
    I am not making my point, clearly.
    HQ Milton are a river, carrying watches like fish in the water.
    They have a huge flow of inventory, much of it not their own on consignment. (Now I cannot vouch for those people).
    Their job is to present the stock - it's up to us to judge the stock, not the people.
    You have to pick the one you want, with eyes open.
    There is absolutely no malice or fraud - quite the reverse they are honest and straight.
    Don't blame them for a poor watch - just don't buy it.
    They are primarily a dealers dealer.
    If you still need armbands you shouldn't go swimming with sharks.
     
    Cad290, td69, Kmart and 4 others like this.
  17. wkimmd Jul 3, 2017

    Posts
    518
    Likes
    959
    I guess you are right. I re-visited the website and re-read the "Dial" description. I think I mis-read before (or for some reason misunderstood) - I agree with you there, it is described appropriately
     
  18. BartH Follows a pattern of overpaying Jul 3, 2017

    Posts
    1,770
    Likes
    7,686
    Looks like a nice 145.012 in a wrong case.
     
  19. arcadelt Jul 3, 2017

    Posts
    1,038
    Likes
    1,299
    The implication is that they are not setting the price or do not have any say in the price, and just take a commission or fee for providing the sales facility, a bit like eBay - do you think that is the case? If not, then I would consider that they have some duty of care to ensure the stock is reasonable and reasonably priced - certainly not for the people here who are all informed, but those buyers off the street that might pay a premium for the resellers or channels reputation. We see this with Hodinkee curated sales, which also attract a premium, and are subjected to outcry if they make a mistake.
     
  20. harrymai86 Jul 3, 2017

    Posts
    1,254
    Likes
    2,708
    Is it just me or the stamped ref no on case back 105.003-64. the "4" looks abit too big and off?