Forums Latest Members

What's Wrong With This Speedmaster Pro Cal 321 145.012 ?

  1. mimo5000 Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    0
    Hello,
    I'm new to this forum, but need some advice on authenticity. I purchased what I was told was an "all original" Speedy Pro cal 321, dated 145.012 1967. I have a few days to return the watch...which I'm now considering due to the issues below. Can I get your expert opinion? Should I send this one back?
    The link below should still work, but I can post some pictures.

    http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=360583053856#ht_8866wt_966Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

    My concerns are:
    - not original bracelet (should be 1039)
    - potentially replaced bezel (it's not a dot-over-90)
    - most concerning is either a replaced dial, or repainted lume on the dial markers, and as I've tried to inspect it closer, the "T SWISS MADE T" seems to be slightly chipped off at the bottom of the lettering (I took the photo below).
    Speedy145.012-1.jpg
    Otherwise, it's a very clean watch and keeps excellent time (chrono is bang on as well).
     
  2. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,831
    Dial is original but relumed, bezel is a later replacement and yes bracelet is nor original. Case also appears to have been polished. If the goal is to get an all original 321 speedmaster this is not it. If the price was right though it's not a bad daily wearer but if it is to be used for that I would replace the hands as well with the new hands and bright lume to match the dial (and keep the original hands of course).
     
  3. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    26,975
    Likes
    32,680
    According to the auction listing you paid $5,000 USD or thereabouts (Canadian dollar is about parity) for that, which is original 1039 bracelet and bezel money, he's not provided that, yours is probably on par with my '67 Speedmaster or slightly less than mine as it lacks an original bezel and dial, and I paid $2,200. Your seller claimed he included an original bracelet, its evident he didn't, I'd use that among other things to request a refund
     
  4. Littleroger Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    384
    Likes
    258
    Although Steve's $2200 is unachievable at the moment, (or ever again?) the watch is not what you expected. Now the seller did choose his wording carefully but he did write "on ITS original bracelet" which is clearly not true as its not possible as that bracelet didn't appear until 1971. Otherwise he always says "original" which they are, though not necessarily originally on THAT watch. Use the bracket quote if you want a refund. You overpaid for what you got.
     
  5. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    Actually "Ashley's". However, every now and then a bargain 2000-2500 Pre-moon Speedy does appear on eBay. You have to be watching constantly for it, as they sell usually within minutes.
     
  6. Littleroger Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    384
    Likes
    258
    Oops!! Sorry Steve. And Ash!

    I must be looking at a different eBay ;) If you see one, feel free to let me know ... Buddy, pal, mate ;)
     
  7. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    There was a little spate of them that went in the £1700-2200 range last month. Might have been a post-xmas dip while bank accounts were recovering from the festivities though.
     
  8. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
  9. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    The price is good. Asking prices in the UK on the transitionals in the last couple of months have been clustered in the £1500-1900 range.

    This one should have one of the moonlanding case backs if it is a 1969. But it could easily be a late 1968 as it has the painted Omega logo on a stepped dial & those were progressively introduced through 1968. So, to my eyes it looks like a correct late 1968 pre-moon & that makes it one of the earlier cal 861's. With a dot over 90 bezel is relatively good condition too it's definitely priced to sell.

    These don't have the value of the cal 321's. But on the upside you can get a cal 861 serviced for a lot less than a cal 321. And you have to assume it'll need a service as soon as you get it.

    ps. compare both your watch & the one above to this: http://www.chrono24.com/en/omega/sp...1--id2305663.htm?id=2305663&picnum=0&tab=pics which is currently the cheapest cal 321 on Chrono24, also without correct bezel & bracelet.
     
  10. pitpro Likes the game. Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    Return the watch. The time to start doing research and asking for help
    from forums is BEFORE you buy. As has been said, you seriously
    overpaid. I'd put a value of abouty $2100. on it, because of the problems
    you can see.(probably some you can't). There are no shortcuts in this hobby.
    Except for asking forum help, but then you are trusting others to make a
    judgement for you. The forums are best used to confirm your feelings or as
    another set of eyes to affirm what you believe. You need to do the homework.
    It's actually the biggest part of the fun of this hobby. A good original example
    of the watch you are looking for can be had for ~ $2800.(Head only) if you are
    patient. Add $400-$500 if it has an original 1039 bracelet in good shape.
     
    SpaceCowboy likes this.
  11. MellyVinelli Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    37
    Likes
    26
    I don't know if you're referring to the c.321 or c.861 but for a c.321, I find that it is challenging to find a good example for $2800. 2800 pounds maybe? More like it, but even then, I'm not so sure it would come with a 1039 bracelet.

    I paid $3600 for a 145.012-67 that comes with a corresponding serial number (28 million) correct me if it seems too far off. It has never been polished and definitely shows wear on the case and also shows case opening marks. It does have one flaw in that the large sweeper was replaced.

    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1361234733.342021.jpg

    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1361234742.437071.jpg
     
  12. pitpro Likes the game. Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    3,073
    Likes
    3,552
    Here's what I said:
    Add $400-$500 if it has an original 1039 bracelet in good shape.
    $2800+500= $3300. for a "good" example, not a great example.

    Here's one with a 1171 bracelet worth maybe $250. that went for
    $3150. That's $2900.
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-speed...JlNbuZs%2BlF9AjN6BdKc%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=ncPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
     
  13. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Feb 18, 2013

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,831
  14. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 19, 2013

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    I agree. The 145.012-67 I bought before Xmas was $2750 without bracelet, which was generally thought to have been a good price.
     
  15. Emeister Donut-eatin desk-divin wannabe-astronaut fat dude Feb 19, 2013

    Posts
    638
    Likes
    1,215
    And the pictured bracelet is actually a 1171/1, so it's the "Modern" replacement for a 1171 (which as stated above wouldn't have been original anyway).


    EDIT: removed suggestion that has already been posted :whistling:
     
    dsio likes this.
  16. jwalther Feb 19, 2013

    Posts
    137
    Likes
    47
    It appears the OP may not have paid the asking price as the item ended as "no longer available." I assume a deal was reached outside eBay. However, if he paid anything more that half the asking price, he should send the watch back. As Mike said, it's not a bad daily wearer, but doesn't seem to meet the OP's requirements for originality.
     
    dsio likes this.
  17. Littleroger Feb 19, 2013

    Posts
    384
    Likes
    258
    Well even if the OP bought it on the QT, it's still not OK and he has a right to be PO'D. I'd sent it back ASAP. ;)
     
    SpikiSpikester and Dash1 like this.
  18. SpikiSpikester @ ΩF Staff Member Feb 19, 2013

    Posts
    3,185
    Likes
    3,774
    I see that the 1968 transitional on eBay has been withdrawn.

    Did anybody here buy it?
     
  19. mimo5000 Feb 19, 2013

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    0
    I'm on my way to return it now (they have already agreed to a return), I appreciate all the advice...and yes, I'll do more research FIRST next time. The seller made it clear I could return it, so I was less concerned. Thank you all very much for your sound advice.

    As an aside, I was in an AD today in Toronto who is selling an unused "Omega Speedmaster 31130423001003 Apollo 15 Chronograph 40th Anniversary" edition (with the red-white-blue dial). They are offering it for $6000 less 40% ($3,600 + tax)...CDN is basically on par with $US. Seems like a great deal.
     
  20. MellyVinelli Feb 19, 2013

    Posts
    37
    Likes
    26
    I've kinda found these special editions to be kind of gimmicky as their limited numbers are simply due to their decision to produce that many. That's just my opinion though so no offense to anybody here who feels otherwise.

    Now the hard to find vintages that are completely original and hard to find due to service centers progressively replacing original worn parts for service replacements makes it become naturally limited which is what I like. Again, comes down to opinion.

    This is what I have also found.
    You see a deal here and a deal there but no matter what the deal doesn't make it a cheap acquisition. After a couple purchases you would end up with enough money to potentially get a grail watch.

    It's totally up to you. Yes it's a good deal as I was offered one at full price lol, but since you recently returned a watch you seemed to really like and now talking about a limited non-vintage, I feel you should wait out any disappointment, watch, learn, prowl, and then pounce on one you really like.

    Forgive me if I completely came out of left field!