Forums Latest Members
  1. OMGRLX a RolexBear in disguise Apr 19, 2016

    Posts
    1,151
    Likes
    2,989
  2. wsfarrell Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    2,441
    Likes
    4,133
    Looks like someone scraped off the lume and glued some attractive small pieces of plastic on the dial. Martha Stewart perhaps.
     
  3. watchlovr Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    Looks like an early dial and insert too.
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  4. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    The aftermarket bracelet and end links have a 7912 buckle attached to it. Crown is not Omega. Not the most attractive SM300 that I have seen.
     
  5. ConElPueblo Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    [​IMG]
     
    nickw, OMGRLX and gemini4 like this.
  6. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    Do they make these in Radium?
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  7. kox Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    561
    Likes
    2,562
    ::confused2:: ...
    T Dial and the type 2 bezel and the hands are correct for the -64 subreference (65/66 production), and so is the 22.99x serial.
    https://omegaforums.net/threads/opinions-on-a-seamaster-300-please.36252/#post-412256


    Clasp is a 1506...and correct for the -64 ... But otherwise agree.
    And yes condition and dial "lume" = ::puke::
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  8. gemini4 Hoarder Of Speed et alia Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    5,855
    Likes
    16,584
    OMGRLX likes this.
  9. al128 unsolicited co-moderation giverer Apr 20, 2016

    Posts
    2,203
    Likes
    2,017
    looks like what could be described as possibly an old redial
    :D
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  10. Wongo Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    511
    Likes
    482
    Thought someone cut the Lum off a watch co dial.
     
    OMGRLX likes this.
  11. Interstellar Apr 21, 2016

    Posts
    298
    Likes
    132

    haha...brilliant!