?

 

!


(sorry I couldn't resist it )

 

&

 

http://www.chronomaddox.com/romans.html

 

You guys are too wordy!! try to be a bit more concise....

 

most exhaustive thread ever!

 

24.53x.yyy with x possibly 7

 

I really hope that you are wrong there, the 105.003 i recently aquired has a 260... serial, i ordered an extract of record and hopefully
Omega can shed some light.
On the other hand if you are wrong, what does this say about your book .

 

My last extract i ordered was last year september, it was for my 145.012 and it clearly stated that watch and case did belong together.
I really hope that they don´t fill in what you want to read.

 

I would take this with a certain degree of skepticism without concrete evidence.

 

Oh boy... i really can´t wait for the book.

 

I have to admit that i am pretty excited with the outcome of my extract, the more we discuss my watch the more i tend to believe that it had a serious service in the early 70ties, but the first owner couldn´t recall if his watch had been gone for a longer time.

 

The reason I asked the question:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-60s...LqOkKjJuM1eOf0%2FseyY%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=ncPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
24,538,858
The late serial, incorrect bezel, and some other things
made me punt. But I was in love with the dial