So I have been wanting t get a Speedmaster but those I want are slightly out of reach. But by being here I have also developed a liking of the Seamasters that came with the 321. So I happen to like that style and I have seen it repeated in several makes, one being Breitling. And the Breitling seems to be more affordable than the Seamaster. The following pictures are the style I seem to like the most. So we get to the point what is the difference between this:



And this?



Besides being a bigger picture of course. All input is appreciated as always.

Thanks,
Rob

Photos courtesy of the web

 

Could be a Venus 175 movement in the Breitling. I doubt it'd the V188 but it could be.

 

Also, the omega there is a cal 320, not 321.

 

A 321 has 3 subdials

 

Those 320's have intrigued me. I too find them very attractive. However I can't help but suspect the nicer examples have service dials. Considering they are pre 321 Seamasters doke of those dials are almost too good to be true.

That said, Valjoux 7733 and 7734 are two register chrono movements. You could certainly find something in that realm.

 

Don't rule out a Landeron. The 148 had wide set subdials like Breitling.

 

Not a Seamaster but it is a 320
No service dial here
There are at least 3 examples amongst members with similar dials

 

There is one Omega with 320 cal. in sales section. You might check it out. https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-2278-3-cal320.42157/

 

To me one of the main differences is legibility. I have an 816 Navitimer which looks great, but from which it's very difficult to read the time. Omegas of this sort tend to be unfussy and with what I think of as a calm, classic look that's very appealing.

 

Ok, I guess I should have mentioned this is more of a generalization, not about these 2 exact watches. I love the style of the 2 or 3 register faces along with the retangular pushers. I know that there are a lot of various watches with this style I have shown above. But what I find is that I can find a Breitling for almost half the cost of an Omega Seamaster with a 321 or an Omega with 320. So I guess I'm ask if the Breitling are comparable to the Omegas? Assuming I just want the style cues? Hope this helps. So would anyone put anBreitling in their collections due to cost restrains? And would you be happy with it?

 

My first chronograph purchase was a Breitling Model 1188 similar to the one you show. I just liked the way it looked and had seen a couple of old magazine advertisements for them featuring cyclists (I've ridden a road bike most of my life) and that was enough for me. It's a great watch, keeps almost perfect time. It's from the lower end of their range, probably gold filled and has a Venus 188 movement. I'm very happy with it.

 

Thank you. This is what I was basically asking. It is sometimes hard to put my thoughts into words. It just comes down to me about the actual style and the quality of the movements within.

 

Like @LouS says there were a LOT of brands. But there were relatively only a few movements. As he mentions also the Venus movements were widely used so parts can be found if needed. This Imperial has a Venus 170 and has the sub-dials up and down. I believe Imperial was a Buren brand. Kind of rare it seems...

 

https://omegaforums.net/threads/omega-2278-3-cal320.42157/#post-496930

Ones for sale here

 

Yes, I have seen it and wanted it right away. Only one problem, I do not have $3500 to drop on a watch at this time. That watch is such a beautiful example of what I want it is rediculous. See this is my point here. Many models share this design. But I have looked mostly at Breitlings, which can be had for $2000 -$2500 in the same or close to same condition. Ok maybe not as the one for sale here is a stunner. But if by style only, I can get one for less but it is not an Omega, than should I? Or just wait until I get the money to buy an Omega such as this? Collecting versus want versus actually money one can spend.
This place is just such a bad influence on me, that my wife thinks I will neglect the house until It crumbles just to procure my wants.

 

The Hyundai Genesis shares a lot of design cues with the Mercedes S Class too. I don't know about you, but I know which one I'd want.

 

LouS, thank you for your insight on this matter. As I have only recently entered the world of Omega and vintage watches as a whole. I only have turned to Swiss Made watches in a hope to get a watch that can be repaired if needed and maintained for a long period of time. The elegance of design has taken me to the vintage markets and every time I see a chronograph as I have posted, well the need to scratch an itch happens. One that I did not have before.

That said, I would prefer an Omega Seamaster with the 321 or a non Seamaster with 320. But I do not in any breathe regard some others makers as sub par. I just have not had the opportunity to learn about them yet. Lou, you just gave me a lot of bad ides of where to look. And as My wife watches me type this, I'm sure the "now what?" is crossing her mind.

And UlackFocus, believe me, Omega will always me my core collection. But maybe not Quartz. Sorry, I like my automatics.

 

That's why I drive an Audi.