Forums Latest Members

what is the 'second' generation of watch collecting about?

  1. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Hey gang,

    So, wonderful vintage one owner watches of all sorts are fast drying up. Collectors are holding and dealers are charging through the nose for certain references.

    Is this a tectonic shift in the general watch collecting biosphere?

    What happens next? Does interest spread to lesser known vintage brands? Does the definition of vintage move up (so 80's watches become hot for example)?

    Maybe this isn't the second gen, maybe the third gen? As interest shifted from pre-war to mid century watches once pre-wars started to thin out?

    Is this a pattern, and if so, what has come before?

    Curious to hear what you guys think.
     
  2. KstateSkier Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    838
    Likes
    3,260
    Maybe we could all start collecting Fossil watches... ::puke::
     
    oddboy likes this.
  3. Ray916MN Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    171
    Likes
    367
    Bubble ....
     
  4. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Funny... this is one I bought about 20 years ago. A one owner Fossil Signature.

    IMG_20141217_195134.jpg IMG_20150214_170731_edit.jpg
     
    blufinz52 and Taddyangle like this.
  5. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    I don't mean about prices, I mean about availability.
     
  6. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    26,949
    Likes
    32,636
    I don't think the well is anywhere near dry at the moment, particularly as a lot of the best 60s 70s and 80s watches can still be with their owners. Omega made 10s of millions of watches in that sought after late 40s through to 70s era, and there are brands like Longines that are still largely untapped.
     
    STANDY, CajunTiger, bazamu and 2 others like this.
  7. Perseus Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    783
    Likes
    643
    That's my guess. Many of the popular vintage brands are IMO very, very expensive.
     
  8. ISAKOFF Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    64
    Likes
    51
    I think we've already seen lesser known vintage brands go for a premium, I think over a certain dollar amount, people will always look for certain things
     
  9. dragoman Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    329
    Likes
    483
    In a not so distant future, we may regret not having bought one of these while they were cheap

    [​IMG]
     
    Nitzbar, Lonestar and jimdgreat1 like this.
  10. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    I'm going to cash in on my 1970 Sears Tradition quartz :thumbsup:
     
  11. kleungsf Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    34
    Likes
    33
    This just screams Six Million Dollar Man TV show to me [emoji38]
     
  12. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Mar 8, 2016

    Posts
    15,476
    Likes
    32,332
    I think you're right.
    I saw the way things were going with my usual vintage choices so I decided to get in early and start collecting these while they're still under the radar.

    RCs.JPG



    <Don't panic, just joking. These were found in a junk box from a watchmaker's estate. All dead and now are living again.>

    :D
     
    Nitzbar, Lonestar and oddboy like this.