Forums Latest Members
  1. Franco May 21, 2017

    Posts
    559
    Likes
    732
    Hello Guys

    I have collected Omega ref 2367 for a long while, have many of them and try to always acquire different case/dial combinations.

    I have come across this dial, and have not yet understood if it is a type which I had never seen before, or an old redial.

    See below the pictures I have taken.

    Arguments pro-original:
    1- The cross dial is very precise and in the right place
    2- the logo/script is also very precise and neat.
    3- the back of the dial does not seem much dirty with paint, and has numbers and inscriptions which seem original
    4- the silver circle is circular brushed
    5- There is no notch at nine on the dial support. But have seen redials without it.

    Cons:
    1- never seen this dial type in original ref 2367
    2- There is no accent on the “e” of “Chronometre”. But have seen others without it.
    3- the dial center seems air sprayed rather than micro brushed

    Please give me your thoughts - always welcome. In particular comments from an old fox like Erich/MacOmega

    Best wishes
    Franco

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids May 21, 2017

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960
    Looks to be a redial, to me.
     
  3. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado May 21, 2017

    Posts
    12,609
    Likes
    29,904
    Refinished.

    Numerals are far to imprecise.
     
  4. mac_omega May 21, 2017

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    IMO it is a re-dial for various reasons, especially the font on "Chronometre", cross hair much too fat, etc.
     
  5. DON May 21, 2017

    Posts
    1,728
    Likes
    1,070
    Redial and average. XII looks sloppy in second image

    DON
     
  6. watchyouwant ΩF Clairvoyant May 22, 2017

    Posts
    5,157
    Likes
    8,673
    yes. re-dial for me as well. kind regards. achim
     
  7. Amadeus May 22, 2017

    Posts
    106
    Likes
    100
    It's really well done but it's a redial.
     
  8. bubba48 May 22, 2017

    Posts
    1,548
    Likes
    7,876
    Hello Franco.
    I agree with all the other guys; it'a a redial.
     
  9. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member May 22, 2017

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    One off older redial.
     
  10. Franco May 22, 2017

    Posts
    559
    Likes
    732