What do we think of this Constellation 2852-6?

Posts
4,940
Likes
18,333
Funny. The straight up picture gives a totally different perspective.
Edited:
 
Posts
8,999
Likes
46,211
Just goes to show that when it comes to purchasing a vintage watch, the only dumb questions are the ones that you don't ask. So far I'm 3 for 3 on buying nice vintage pieces with help from OF members. Incredibly helpful resource.
 
Posts
9,591
Likes
27,598
They even got the brushing on the outside portion of the dial correct.

Scary good,
gatorcpa

Funny. The straight up picture gives a totally difference perspective.

I was impressed until I saw the head-on picture. Too thick crosshairs and inconsistencies in printing (at 6 o'clock as @Shabbaz says).
 
Posts
8,999
Likes
46,211
I was impressed until I saw the head-on picture. Too thick crosshairs and inconsistencies in printing (at 6 o'clock as @Shabbaz says).
I thank you as well for your comments. Learning more every day as to how to avoid landmines.
 
Posts
12,526
Likes
16,878
Too thick crosshairs and inconsistencies in printing (at 6 o'clock as @Shabbaz says).
This is true. However, these are easy defects to fix for the next one.

They got the basics, such as the fonts, aging lacquer and the two tone finish correct.

That's why it is scary good.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
9,591
Likes
27,598
This is true. However, these are easy defects to fix for the next one.

They got the basics, such as the fonts, aging lacquer and the two tone finish correct.

That's why it is scary good.
gatorcpa

That finish is remarkable.
 
Posts
7,847
Likes
56,938
And I'm not so sure a cal 501 would have been installed in a sixth production run of a 2852. Seems late.
 
Posts
6,586
Likes
11,260
REdial.

How that dial should look like:

15064476904_007b0902cf_c.jpg
Edited:
 
Posts
12,526
Likes
16,878
Let’s put these side by side for comparison



If I could only adjust the lighting.

Still way too close for comfort.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
2,520
Likes
17,815
Swiss Made isn’t centered under the 6 either. I was fooled at first too. The straight on photo makes it clear.

This is an enormous peeve of mine — when sellers photos make it obvious he’s trying to hide something. Particularly the professional watch dealers on eBay, whose photo quality varies depending on the watch.

You guys are so good at this. 👍

I wonder how many watches, collectively, OF members view every day?

The longer you do this, the easier this gets, I think.

Here’s my comparison of the two dials


This makes it really obvious. I don’t like the hands either.
 
Posts
6,586
Likes
11,260
Look at where the crosshairs meet the minute hashmarks at 3,6,9, and 12. Lots of decent redials get those spots wrong. And of course what I meant by REdial is the use of ER instead of RE in chronometre.
 
Posts
3,181
Likes
12,505
Before I joined this forum, I didn’t know about the importance of straight-on pictures. This is the best proof. Looks so much better from an angle, even though - thankfully - there are still smaller details like the weird a and the re vs er spelling. But much harder to notice.
 
Posts
8,999
Likes
46,211
Let’s put these side by side for comparison



If I could only adjust the lighting.
Still way too close for comfort.
gatorcpa

I think that we all have to admit that it’s a pretty damn good redial. Not perfect by any means, but much better than many of the redials that are discussed on OF and certainly good enough to fool a lot of potential buyers.
 
Posts
2,278
Likes
6,536
How that dial should look like:

A bit of a critique of that particular picture: way too much use of image sharpening.Notice the white areas around the black areas. It has the effect of making the edges of the lines look sharper than they are.


 
Posts
24
Likes
53
Look at where the crosshairs meet the minute hashmarks at 3,6,9, and 12. Lots of decent redials get those spots wrong. And of course what I meant by REdial is the use of ER instead of RE in chronometre.
Oooo I also noticed this and was wondering if this is a dead giveaway of a redial? Could it be possible that chronometer/re could’ve been produced both ways originally?