What do we think of this Constellation 2852-6?

Posts
5,000
Likes
18,558
Funny. The straight up picture gives a totally different perspective.
Edited:
 
Posts
9,876
Likes
55,785
Just goes to show that when it comes to purchasing a vintage watch, the only dumb questions are the ones that you don't ask. So far I'm 3 for 3 on buying nice vintage pieces with help from OF members. Incredibly helpful resource.
 
Posts
9,588
Likes
27,696
They even got the brushing on the outside portion of the dial correct.

Scary good,
gatorcpa

Funny. The straight up picture gives a totally difference perspective.

I was impressed until I saw the head-on picture. Too thick crosshairs and inconsistencies in printing (at 6 o'clock as @Shabbaz says).
 
Posts
9,876
Likes
55,785
I was impressed until I saw the head-on picture. Too thick crosshairs and inconsistencies in printing (at 6 o'clock as @Shabbaz says).
I thank you as well for your comments. Learning more every day as to how to avoid landmines.
 
Posts
13,420
Likes
18,626
Too thick crosshairs and inconsistencies in printing (at 6 o'clock as @Shabbaz says).
This is true. However, these are easy defects to fix for the next one.

They got the basics, such as the fonts, aging lacquer and the two tone finish correct.

That's why it is scary good.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
9,588
Likes
27,696
This is true. However, these are easy defects to fix for the next one.

They got the basics, such as the fonts, aging lacquer and the two tone finish correct.

That's why it is scary good.
gatorcpa

That finish is remarkable.
 
Posts
8,617
Likes
61,345
And I'm not so sure a cal 501 would have been installed in a sixth production run of a 2852. Seems late.
 
Posts
6,671
Likes
11,593
REdial.

How that dial should look like:

15064476904_007b0902cf_c.jpg
Edited:
 
Posts
13,420
Likes
18,626
Let’s put these side by side for comparison



If I could only adjust the lighting.

Still way too close for comfort.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
2,519
Likes
17,831
Swiss Made isn’t centered under the 6 either. I was fooled at first too. The straight on photo makes it clear.

This is an enormous peeve of mine - when sellers photos make it obvious he’s trying to hide something. Particularly the professional watch dealers on eBay, whose photo quality varies depending on the watch.

You guys are so good at this. 👍

I wonder how many watches, collectively, OF members view every day?

The longer you do this, the easier this gets, I think.

Here’s my comparison of the two dials


This makes it really obvious. I don’t like the hands either.
 
Posts
6,671
Likes
11,593
Look at where the crosshairs meet the minute hashmarks at 3,6,9, and 12. Lots of decent redials get those spots wrong. And of course what I meant by REdial is the use of ER instead of RE in chronometre.
 
Posts
3,443
Likes
13,263
Before I joined this forum, I didn’t know about the importance of straight-on pictures. This is the best proof. Looks so much better from an angle, even though - thankfully - there are still smaller details like the weird a and the re vs er spelling. But much harder to notice.
 
Posts
9,876
Likes
55,785
Let’s put these side by side for comparison



If I could only adjust the lighting.
Still way too close for comfort.
gatorcpa

I think that we all have to admit that it’s a pretty damn good redial. Not perfect by any means, but much better than many of the redials that are discussed on OF and certainly good enough to fool a lot of potential buyers.
 
Posts
2,454
Likes
7,059
How that dial should look like:

A bit of a critique of that particular picture: way too much use of image sharpening.Notice the white areas around the black areas. It has the effect of making the edges of the lines look sharper than they are.


 
Posts
24
Likes
53
Look at where the crosshairs meet the minute hashmarks at 3,6,9, and 12. Lots of decent redials get those spots wrong. And of course what I meant by REdial is the use of ER instead of RE in chronometre.
Oooo I also noticed this and was wondering if this is a dead giveaway of a redial? Could it be possible that chronometer/re could’ve been produced both ways originally?