Forums Latest Members
  1. Mr Blond Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    406
    I bought this about 5 years ago not knowing if it was built from parts or the real thing.

    So to my limited knowledge the case looks period with wear and tear. The movement number is 3035****

    According to this site it’s around 1969 and seems to fall inside the serial number range but this was from 5 years ago. Just wondered if anyone had any more information. Who has the highest serial number for a sm300?

    http://www.svetsatova.com/forum/f89/omega-seamaster-300-including-military-watches-5980.html
     
    DSC00355.JPG DSC00358.JPG DSC00360.JPG DSC00361.JPG DSC00363.JPG DSC00443.JPG DSC00444.JPG
  2. Mr Blond Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    406
    no extract
     
    a.jpg
  3. Mr Blond Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    406
    Now on a 1175 bracelet with modified endlinks
     
    4950BB39-7791-4EAE-89D3-0AB581479DAB.jpeg A596A5D3-74FC-4412-ABA1-883457E6D60D.jpeg 0253DE82-8904-4468-8CA6-6AE63E2E9295.jpeg
    SW4323 likes this.
  4. Dash1 Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    1,825
    Likes
    3,502
    Mmmm, looks like a bit of a franken. New service dial, hands and bezel combined with a period case and a movement from another model. At least it's a watch you can enjoy wearing without fear of damaging or losing it.
     
    Davidt likes this.
  5. Mr Blond Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    406
    The hands dial and bezel were replaced. But if it had been sent off to omega for a service they would also have replace these parts. Or perhaps the original owner had them replaced, who knows.

    Seems strange to use an old case, you’d just buy a new one.
     
    Edited Sep 21, 2017
  6. Mr Blond Sep 21, 2017

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    406
    I suppose I will never know 100%

    I guess I’m just interested in who has a late serial number and who else couldn’t get an archive?