Forums Latest Members
  1. Patrik83 Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    316
    Likes
    275
    Hi Guys,

    I have for a while been seeking to buy a vintage Speedmaster and been aiming for a 105.012 or earlier. I was offered the following watch and I wanted to double check my sitings and that I made the right decision to turn it down. Learn, learn and learn.

    No box and no documentation besides a service made in 2010 with receipt.

    In that service document of 2010 it states the following:
    - Service of movement
    - Some parts of the movement exchanged
    - New Crown
    - New Pushers
    - New hands
    - New crystal
    - New Dial/bezel
    - Polish
    - Pressure test

    The parts exchanged on the watch is included on the side, se images.

    Price offered: 8.500 USD

    Let's get right to the pictures:
    IMG_4779.JPG
    IMG_4789.JPG
    IMG_4781.JPG
    IMG_4792.JPG
    IMG_4780.JPG IMG_4793.JPG
    IMG_4782_2.jpg
    IMG_4783.JPG IMG_4799.JPG IMG_4802.JPG IMG_4798.JPG
    IMG_4786.JPG IMG_4790.JPG
    IMG_4787.JPG IMG_4788.JPG
    Parts included on the side:
    IMG_4794.JPG IMG_4795.JPG IMG_4796.JPG IMG_4784.JPG
    IMG_4785.JPG

    At first I was thinking that I would basically just need to put the old parts back in to make it correct. However, I noticed the following:

    Hands
    On the watch:
    Correct, but new
    Hands on the side: The "old" hour and minute hands are not as pointy as they should (what are these?) and that the "old" chrono is a square end spear and not a spear with rounded end.

    Dial
    One the watch:
    As per last service, dial was changed. This is worng as it by the looks if ut does not have a step and there are no T markings.
    On the side: By the looks of it seems like a service dial.

    Movement
    Is in the correct range for a 105.012-66 (based on speedmaster101) but it could also be a 142.012-67. An extract would let us know.

    Bezel
    On the watch: New, not DON post 1990
    On the side: Correct DON bezel but with smaller dents. Personally I like more faded print than bump.

    Case
    Hard to see the typical CB facet lines, are most likely be gone after polish, however I do feel the form of the case is more in line with a HF than CB. Is my assumption wrong?

    Back case
    I think it looks good, maybe too good to be that old?

    Bracelet
    Later version speedmaster bracelet, not correct

    Conclusion
    Franken watch, not what I am after. It's value is equal with the parts.

    Views?
     
  2. Foo2rama Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can. Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    17,087
    Likes
    25,329
    Outside the chrono hand it looks good...

    I’d value it below good minus the service to put it original and a correct crown, and hand.
     
  3. airansun In the shuffling madness Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    There’s a lot to unpack here.

    The case isn’t a great CB case. Some of the lugs don’t really show the expected ledge.
    4502A001-43C8-46EE-9D78-5EDAD028C976.jpeg

    On the other hand, the case back is pretty nice. The pushers are service.
    91A06A29-FDE4-48DB-87E6-E4D478405D67.jpeg

    The old dial is right but most of the lume is gone.
    D7CEE7EA-6E1D-47AA-A2E3-91E3710D6AC6.jpeg

    The old bezel is real nice.

    The old hands are not great and I suspect they were service hands.

    I’d put the old bezel back on but leave the rest as is. There are advantages to a luminova 321.

    Having said all that, I now also acknowledge that I have such a luminova CB and I love it

    408839EE-3D57-4B26-AFE4-0D51E5C7DA6E.jpeg

    The only thing I did to mine, an eBay find, was to put a luminova leaf tailed chrono hand on it. It came with that bezel, believe it or not. I paid $5.5 earlier this year.

    I think $8k is high. The bracelet and old parts make the deal, but maybe $6k+.
     
    Edited Jan 10, 2019
  4. OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    Thinking in spare part values, I would buy it, knowing there has a lot of work to be done, unless you are intending to sell the parts separately.

    The case has been polished, but could be refinished in a better way. Caseback looks good, though polished as well. The most important original part, the dial, looks ok and can be remounted.

    Original DON bezel (maybe you should keep it ?), hands, bracelet and the other service parts could be sold to raise some funds for buying better / correct ones.
     
  5. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    At least it comes with the original parts, which equate to about 1/3 or 1/4 of the asking price or so.

    However, I'd prefer a killer 861 - a -68 or - 69 - at that price, personally.
     
    BenBagbag, AS69, stefman and 6 others like this.
  6. kingsrider Thank you Sir! May I have another? Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,689
    Likes
    5,431
    That last pic does show remnants of the facets on the lower two lugs. Are the pushers correct?

    Wooops, I din't realize I was looking at a different watch.::facepalm1::
     
  7. Dan S Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    18,767
    Likes
    43,124
    Washed dial, polished case, dented bezel, wrong sweep hand. There is really nothing nice about it. If it were all assembled with the original parts, I don't think people would be recommending that the OP buy it at $8.5k. There are no bones nice enough to justify an investment.
     
    ndgal and airansun like this.
  8. ndgal Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    AVOID. This watch is dead.
     
  9. OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    Why?

    It comes along with a lot of matching vintage essentials, that are in good condition.
     
  10. bazamu wincer, not a bidder Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,678
    Likes
    7,227
    I wouldn't do it personally, as I'd rather pay 20% more for a fully original, well sorted example. Taking the "budget" route is the most often repeated mistake that I see people make in the hobby (if they don't have to)

    Do the subdials looks weird to anyone else? It could totally be the lighting, but the base of the sub-dial almost looks raised or puffy, and all of the 105.012's that have passed through my hands look more like this beautiful CB that I never should have sold :
    IMG_9482.jpg
     
    Etp095 likes this.
  11. ndgal Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    That dial is good? It’s washed. All lume gone.
    Plus in case you haven’t noticed this is a CB case. They polished all of the CB-ness off of it..
    Add another $1,200 for a correct flat foot crown and and fat neck pushers.. Not even mentioning the 1039/516 bracelet...
    A very expensive restoration project for a not so good end result...
     
    Speedy Gonzales and mr_yossarian like this.
  12. OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    Yes, I fully agree basically.

    But as I said: Thinking in spare part values, the price is ok.

    And driven by emotion and the will of restoring it, you won't be disappointed later on, because these watches can be considered as an investment.

    That said, for the latter, I think this watch is a good base to start from.

    Perfect pieces are getting more and more unobtainable.
     
  13. ndgal Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,274
    Likes
    5,484
    You can't restore the CB case facets once polished off to that degree.
    The midcase id dead.
    The DON bezel looks like it was bit by a Pitbull.
    Washed dial.
    Flaked hands. (later chrono hand).
    Wrong crown & pushers.

    With the amount of money needed to "Restore" this piece (and there is really no way if even bringing it back to acceptable condition) I would avoid this project.

    And again, as the number one rule in buying vintage says:

    It is always better to overpay for a stellar example than buying a mediocre one "on the cheap"...
     
    AS69, Speedy Gonzales, sdre and 6 others like this.
  14. OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    All true.

    What do you think this watch would be worth sold in parts?
     
  15. airansun In the shuffling madness Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    Bezel is at least $2.5k. Some bad dings but the printing is nearly entirely intact.
    Movement is underpriced at $2.5k in case there are issues. It’s the right serial number for a CB
    Dial is at least $1.5k. It looks okay other than the lume loss. It can be relumed.
    Caseback is at least $1.0k. Somebody’s got a CB with a gouged up back.
    Hands maybe $400
    Bracelet another $400

    I maybe off here or there, but still Adds up to around $8k in parts. And I’m writing off the mid case.

    If you think I’m far off in my estimates, I’d love to hear.
     
    eugeneandresson, ndgal and OMEGuy like this.
  16. OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    Value = 0.00 $?

    No. I think it will be around 1k as well.
     
  17. Dan S Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    18,767
    Likes
    43,124
    What’s the point in adding up the value if none of the parts are good enough to keep? So you sell them all and hope to break even? With a lot of effort and risk? Makes no sense.
     
  18. Patrik83 Jan 11, 2019

    Posts
    316
    Likes
    275
    Well for me, I would rather not have the bumps and instead have less good print but we are all different ;)

    Personally I agree here, I'm not in it to earn money or put a lot of time in to buying/selling the right stuff. However I'm not in need of a collectors watch. I am after a watch that I can feel good about wearing and not be afraid to use.
     
  19. Patrik83 Jan 11, 2019

    Posts
    316
    Likes
    275
    The separate hands look different to what I am used to see on Speedmasters. What are they? Not genuine, right? I have tried to find more information about the hands but not been successful.
     
    Screenshot 2019-01-11 at 09.46.12.png
  20. Nla91 Jan 11, 2019

    Posts
    206
    Likes
    737
    Yes, that's a replacement handset. The tip of the hands are way more flat that original Speedmaster hands. They could be from Mark II's?