Forums Latest Members

Vulcain cricket opinions and advice...

  1. TritonDND Feb 1, 2019

    Posts
    44
    Likes
    31
    Hello everyone. After investing in my first few vintage pieces (Omega Seamaster and Constellation,)I have become increasing interested in the Vulcain cricket and have to decided to add one to my collection. Particularly the "Truman" version or something similar (circa 1950-1960s.) I've come across two 'contenders' that are supposedly 100% authentic without redial or anything and both look to be decent quality. Not certain about last servicing but both cal. 120 look decent.

    This link (Vulcain Watches - History - Presidents watch) shows the Truman era cricket that I very much like the aesthetics of. The series of pictures are the two that I am considering. Any opinions on what decent offers for either of these should be? The gold one is 14k solid gold, not gold plated.

    Thanks, and appreciate the feedback! cricket_g1.jpg cricket_g2.jpg cricket_g3.jpg cricket_g4.jpg cricket_g5.jpg cricket_g6.jpg
     
    cricket_g7.jpg cricket_g8.jpg cricket_g9.jpg cricket_g10.jpg cricket_s1.jpg cricket_s2.jpg cricket_s3.jpg cricket_s4.jpg cricket_s5.jpg cricket_s6.jpg cricket_s7.jpg cricket_s8.jpg
    noelekal likes this.
  2. TimtimeIntl Feb 1, 2019

    Posts
    302
    Likes
    1,184
    I have never seen the last one with black dial. Cool
     
  3. Mitka Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    422
    Likes
    793
    Great watches!
     
  4. bubba48 Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    1,548
    Likes
    7,876
    I prefer the black one; it's amazing and really uncommon.

    This is my Cricket

    vulcain cricket (10).jpg
     
    Dan S and MMMD like this.
  5. ahsposo Most fun screen name at ΩF Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    3,745
    Likes
    19,993
    I'd buy them both...
     
    Ko1892 likes this.
  6. Deafboy His Holiness Puer Surdus Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    2,185
    Likes
    6,144
    They are both nice but case material affects desirability from a collector's perspective. On the black watch, it's not clear if the case is stainless steel or chrome plated. What does the back say? Shown below are two pictures taken from the internet.

    Also, did you check out Eric Wind's informative article on the Cricket?

    The movement on the black example looks good but I would have the movement serviced as of any vintage watch. The movement on the gold sample is too small to assess.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  7. GregH Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    913
    Likes
    8,046
    Here is my Cricket, which has the same black dial as your second option, but with gold hands and in a gold capped case with unusual lugs:
    7CDF45DB-1FED-4AD2-A97A-B7E963D3BEB2.jpeg
     
    Edited Feb 2, 2019
  8. TritonDND Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    44
    Likes
    31
    The black dial version states stainless steel on the back not Chrome. So I think that's definitely a positive. I can pick each up under $1K (maybe $~800ish) but really am only in the market for one. Most of my watches are stainless steel as that is what I prefer so was leaning toward the gold case as I don't have any gold watches. My collection is mainly to wear so I don't like to double up on styles too much as I think I'd just have watches sitting around unworn.
     
  9. Dan S Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    18,810
    Likes
    43,263
    I would grab the black one. Very unusual and fantastic condition - gorgeous lume. Truly a collector-quality watch. The gold one is less interesting to me, and it has some flaws on the dial that make it less desirable.

    @bubba48 has my favorite Cricket dial.
     
    Edited Feb 2, 2019
  10. TritonDND Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    44
    Likes
    31
    Also here's a better picture of the movement on the gold case option cricket_g11.jpg
     
  11. TritonDND Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    44
    Likes
    31
    Interesting though, there are so many dials with the crickets that it's hard to tell if on the black one the dial has been swapped from a watch with Gold case and gold hands. I've seen this black dial with the gilt numbers and hour markers in gold cases with gold hands before but never before in combination with steel.

    I think it's probably impossible to know though since there are so many dial/case variations and these early cal. 120's didn't necessarily match movement/case/dials.
     
  12. Wuza72 Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    453
    Likes
    676
    The Black Dial kicks me, verry nice watch
     
  13. bigsom Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    1,312
    Likes
    10,509
    That gold one looks like it might have a restored dial. Some inconsistencies with the font.
     
  14. ext1 Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    1,134
    Likes
    1,673
    Crickets are awesome! Here is my soon-to-come cricket:
    [​IMG]
    Dibs were honored by @slique12 :)
     
  15. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    16,353
    Likes
    44,926
    If it’s the alarm feature that intrigues you, don’t forget the 393A15E7-506A-42D1-A8C3-2CE3930806DB.jpeg
     
  16. Deafboy His Holiness Puer Surdus Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    2,185
    Likes
    6,144
    The chrome version would not say "chrome" it would say "stainless steel back"
     
    TritonDND and Dan S like this.
  17. François Pépin Feb 2, 2019

    Posts
    1,531
    Likes
    1,081
    Both looks great!

    Note that the movement of the gold one is missing one of the ratchet screw, which is weird.
     
    TritonDND and Deafboy like this.