JMG
路I am 12 years older than my wife. I am glad that she has seen the value of vintage... while I have seen the value of something new. 馃槜 This is in my confidence that she is not also on this forum...
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Thanks Jim
the scratched and banged up dials and not knowing how the watch was cared for, serviced and perhaps even a fake makes a new Speedmaster very desireable to me.
I am new here, and happy to be reading and learning about these watches.
I want to add a Speedmaster to my collection and am puzzled to see the older Speedies in very good condition selling for $ 4,000 to $ 7,500 and more. Everyone is saying that the vintage Speedmaster prices have risen quite dramatically lately which is good news for those selling, but what I don't understand is I am seeing new and newer Speedmaster watches selling for $ 3,000
Am I am missing something ? Why are collectors paying a large premium for a used Speedmaster ?
Guess I just like watches. I am not a collector.
https://bulangandsons.com/love-for-the-vintage-omega-speedmaster/
Guess I just like watches. I am not a focussed collector.
https://bulangandsons.com/love-for-the-vintage-omega-speedmaster/
Guess I just like watches. I am not a collector.
https://bulangandsons.com/love-for-the-vintage-omega-speedmaster/
I'll take it one step further. The collectors' value in these watches are based on the particular association between Omega and NASA with the US space program in the 1960's. IMO, this has little to do with the quality of the movement or its timekeeping abilities. Not that there's anything wrong with that. 馃榾
The cal. 321 movement was used by Omega in many, many models prior to the introduction of the Speedmaster in 1957 and the NASA competition a few years later. These are popular, but nowhere near as popular as the Speedmaster. Accordingly, they don't carry the same level of collectors' premium.
There are a lot of watches that are valued more for who wore similar examples than for anything else having to do with horology. Some the 1960's Heuer chronograph models fall in this category, as does the "Paul Newman" Rolex Daytona.
Some years ago, I purchased a nice 1959 Rolex Oyster Perpetual for well under $1,000. I've since been told that my de-cased cal. 1030 movement would be worth about double the value of the complete and running watch. Why? Because several very desirable (and very expensive) Rolex models of similar vintage used the same movement. Since Rolex does not divulge any information about their vintage watches or supply NOS parts for this caliber, any or all of the movement parts could be swapped out with no reduction in value.
So a better analogy would be:
![]()
Classic, but relatively inexpensive, and
![]()
Vintage and very expensive...but both cars used the same engines!
gatorcpa