Vintage Speedmaster beginner test!

Posts

1,856

Likes

2,537

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

For the members starting into vintage Speedmasters and who already gained some knowledge:

Which parts visiable in these pictures are correct for a 105.012-65 (despite the watch case) ??

Not too many as it seems... 🙁










Good luck!

 

Posts

1,144

Likes

3,107

perks713

·Sep 23, 2021

I think someone etched 'Chrono24.com' onto the watch, which I believe is not original.

 

Posts

1,856

Likes

2,537

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

perks713

I think someone etched 'Chrono24.com' onto the watch, which I believe is not original.

Close but not corrcet 😉

 

Posts

777

Likes

942

vienna

·Sep 23, 2021

just the subdial hands seem to be correct to me.

kind regards Max

 

Posts

2,510

Likes

3,727

rcs914

·Sep 23, 2021

Pretty sure that is a -74 with a replacement modern bezel. If the caseback says -65 I think someone swapped it. Seriously - does it actually have a 321? Because that dial shouldn't fit a 321.

 

Posts

1,856

Likes

2,537

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

rcs914

Pretty sure that is a -74 with a replacement modern bezel. If the caseback says -65 I think someone swapped it. Seriously - does it actually have a 321? Because that dial shouldn't fit a 321.

321 is inside

 

M

Posts

323

Likes

225

myatt

·Sep 23, 2021

Then everything would be incorrect 😵‍💫 including dial, bezel and hands.👎

 

Posts

20,231

Likes

46,912

Dan S

·Sep 23, 2021

Pushers are good. 👍

 

Posts

1,856

Likes

2,537

Passover

·Sep 23, 2021

Dan S

Pushers are good. 👍

That was my thought also 😀

 

Posts

1,072

Likes

1,480

Dgercp

·Sep 23, 2021

Dan S

Pushers are good. 👍

Didn't he say beginners 😀

 

Posts

1,552

Likes

3,643

Seaborg

·Sep 23, 2021

Poor Speedy