Forums Latest Members

Vintage Speedmaster - “I wear it in the pool”...

  1. padders Oooo subtitles! Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    8,991
    Likes
    13,940
    Umm what isn’t true? The watch is rated to 50m. You are delusional and yet again factually inaccurate. No change there.
     
    Edited Sep 21, 2019
  2. JwRosenthal Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    14,925
    Likes
    40,276
    Did someone say SNORKEL???

    36ACDAA6-0DA3-40DD-84F6-6342FD560920.jpeg
     
    Taybharr, padders and M'Bob like this.
  3. Stufflers Mom Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,530
    Likes
    3,472
    According to Omega's own documented guidance 50m water resistance = not suitable for snorkelling at a depth of 1m.
     
  4. M'Bob Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    6,405
    Likes
    18,192
    Honestly, I have know idea why this persists.
     
  5. JwRosenthal Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    14,925
    Likes
    40,276
    SNORKEL!

    71FDE33E-6A01-4E19-9276-A9A34AA33595.jpeg

    I think this is my new drinking game.
     
    Kmart, BlackTulip, padders and 3 others like this.
  6. tyrantlizardrex Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    8,881
    Likes
    27,410
    50m water resistance = water resistant to 50m
     
  7. M'Bob Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    6,405
    Likes
    18,192
    Hope springs eternal at 50 meters
     
    JwRosenthal likes this.
  8. JwRosenthal Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    14,925
    Likes
    40,276
    SNORKEL! Your turn to buy the pint!



    92608BC9-A983-4C59-99BD-F573281E0232.jpeg
     
  9. Stufflers Mom Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,530
    Likes
    3,472
    What isn't true you say?
    Well you made the following statement "It clearly says the watch is covered against immersion to 50m." and really doesn't, but if it does please post it here, if you can't then it might be you that's delusional and factually inaccurate.
     
  10. padders Oooo subtitles! Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    8,991
    Likes
    13,940
    Interesting question. What is it you think the 50m means? Yes I will take the time to find something that shows you that your talking nonsense but I sense you won’t care.
     
  11. gostang9 Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    7,105
    Wasn’t it you who posted this visual aid?

    037D6CEC-A716-4FFA-B8F7-8A14363FA031.jpeg
     
  12. saulgoodman Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    355
    Likes
    389
  13. airansun In the shuffling madness Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    7B2E2E8D-8092-4127-8606-148E75733A60.jpeg

    Corrected. There you go. ;)
     
  14. Stufflers Mom Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,530
    Likes
    3,472
    Yes it was me, but if you take the time to read it and look at the corresponding pics it explains that while the watches are rated they also have examples of the practical uses and the limits of the rating, and at no point does it make the claim the a 5 bar watch is protected to be immersed at a depth of 50m, quite the reverse actually.
     
  15. padders Oooo subtitles! Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    8,991
    Likes
    13,940
    Wrong. Again.
     
  16. gostang9 Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    2,668
    Likes
    7,105
    How do you read “submersion in water” and assume it means “quite the reverse actually”... ? ::confused2::
     
  17. CPRwatch Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    4,248
    Likes
    58,140
    So it’s safe to wear whilst taking a shower , not saying I want too but was slightly concerned that the water resistance of a speedy was less than rice paper according to the general consensus.
     
  18. Stufflers Mom Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,530
    Likes
    3,472
    You can't just make up a point simply by paraphrasing. It's the submersion in water up to depth of 50m that is at issue, the Omega guidance states that the activity of snorkelling is not recommended hence the reverse.
     
  19. Stufflers Mom Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    1,530
    Likes
    3,472
    Please post a correction if you can, but we both know you can't.;)
     
  20. tyrantlizardrex Sep 21, 2019

    Posts
    8,881
    Likes
    27,410
    It clearly states that they don't recommend the watch for Snorkeling. Nowhere does it state that a watch with 50m of water resistance is not water resistant to 50m.

    Given that freedivers include a snorkel in their kit, and the world record for constant weight freediving is currently 120m, I'd argue that watches with 100m of water resistant are not suitable or snorkeling... no matter what Omega's chart says. ;)
     
    lando and Socks like this.