Forums Latest Members
  1. oskedsmo Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    Hi!
    I got this watch for my comfirmation, but i don't know a lot about watches. Does anybody here know anything about it? I think its a 1964 model. 1379436484126.jpg
     
  2. Joe K. Curious about this text thingy below his avatar Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    1,648
    Likes
    2,100
    The 600 hundred series was based on the 600 series manual wind movements. This could be a ref 135.011, but we would need to see pictures of the movement and inside the case back. The dial on the watch is not original and is repainted.
    Hope this helps.
     
  3. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    12,589
    Likes
    29,840
    Dial has been refinished in a style and color not offered on these originally.
     
  4. Hijak Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    1964 Seamaster 600 reference 136.011 for comparison...

    Wrist Shot.JPG
     
  5. oskedsmo Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    I don't have the date counter, did they come without those?
     
  6. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    12,589
    Likes
    29,840
    Seamaster 600 was produced with and without the date feature.
     
    oskedsmo likes this.
  7. Hijak Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Yes they did...mine is a Cal. 611 movement which had the date. Some of the 600 movements did not have the date.
     
  8. oskedsmo Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    Thanks for the help, i will try to get some papers on it :)
     
  9. Hijak Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    Your movement could be a cal. 601 which would not have a date.
     
  10. oskedsmo Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    Here is a picture of the inside, yes it says it is a 601. And one more question, it says 17 jewels, what does that mean?
     
    1379443414843.jpg
  11. ulackfocus Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Got a shot of the inside of the caseback?
     
  12. oskedsmo Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    0
    Here
     
    1379445823915.jpg
  13. cvalue13 Sep 17, 2013

    Posts
    3,979
    Likes
    8,394