Forums Latest Members
  1. theomegagirl96 Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    0
    Hi everyone!

    Would love any and all thoughts on the legitimacy of this interesting piece :)

    Thanking you in advance!
     
    EDD81AB4-F83D-4ECD-B256-6D075758489D.jpeg E8F7C86A-6AEC-40D9-ACE1-A1ECB8E1CF18.jpeg CCFBE697-A27F-4EE7-921A-AC2BCE44D7CD.jpeg 7C692A57-39B8-4A2A-8D64-2B3AEF089F68.jpeg AAC163DC-B48E-4C5F-9D0F-933F5BB10D3E.jpeg AFE828AC-6D29-4128-9A32-C853B0C8C78C.jpeg
  2. connieseamaster Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    1,375
    Likes
    1,979
    Pretty certain that the crown is not original, and honestly, the dial has my redial antenna tingling, but not 100% on that either. Case edges seem soft for what they should be too.
     
    Passover and Dan S like this.
  3. kingsrider Thank you Sir! May I have another? Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,689
    Likes
    5,431
    Welcome to the form. The case has seen a hard polishing, I would say that is most likely a redial. Once again :mad:, we need the price for a full evaluation. If it is $100 go for it. If it is $1000 no way.
     
    connieseamaster and efauser like this.
  4. OMEGuy Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    I think the dial has been refinished (I'm not even sure it's the correct style for this reference) and the hands are not matching the dial.

    Then ref. 166.009 should have a date feature automatic cal. 562 movement as well, which doesn't match the cal. 601 movement.

    Looks like a put-together (franken) watch to me.
     
    connieseamaster and VetPsychWars like this.
  5. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
    I think "piece of crap" comes to mind.
     
    89-0, ahsposo, X350 XJR and 1 other person like this.
  6. Shabbaz Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    4,900
    Likes
    17,865
    This is a 166.009. I think...
     
    Screenshot_20200223-172650_Gallery.jpg
    WatchCor, Spruce, OMEGuy and 2 others like this.
  7. VetPsychWars Wants to be in the club! Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    2,326
    Likes
    1,862
    I agree, my first response, "that's a mutt."

    Tom
     
  8. connieseamaster Feb 23, 2020

    Posts
    1,375
    Likes
    1,979
    This. For $100-$200, it's a nice looking fashion piece. For much more than that, it's not worth spending money on.
     
  9. Samuel23 Mar 10, 2020

    Posts
    1
    Likes
    0
    Most of these men will rather have this instead.
     
    E2564B53-28A1-42AF-9BF2-BEC439966368.jpeg
  10. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Mar 10, 2020

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
    Thanks for stopping by.
     
    OMEGuy likes this.
  11. Shabbaz Mar 10, 2020

    Posts
    4,900
    Likes
    17,865
    Are you Maximilian from vintage portfolio?
     
    OMEGuy likes this.
  12. OMEGuy Mar 10, 2020

    Posts
    2,086
    Likes
    2,783
    I'm not convinced my acne days were something I'd rather have. Women have acne as well. But I agree, they wouldn't want to have the watch, maybe.