Vintage Navitimer decision: unpolished but blemished vs. polished and unblemished

Posts
543
Likes
694
Hi OF. So I'm in the market for a vintage Breitling Navitimer Cosmonaute (ref. 809), and I've narrowed it down to 2 examples.

Example #1 is unpolished, but it has some sort of discoloration/corrosion/spotting on the midcase surrounding the crown/pushers, as well as a gouge on the back/side of one lug and heavy scratches on the back of another lug near the springbar. (First 4 photos).

Example #2 has none of these blemishes, but it has of course been polished. (Second 5 photos). So naturally, I wonder primarily what folks think about the severity of the blemishes vs. the severity of the polishing.

Regarding other factors, I think the dials are a tie (but let me know if you think differently), and example #2 was just serviced in 10/2023 (but is still running +19 sec/day) and has a new crystal/pushers/crown. Example #2 is ~$500 cheaper, but I think example #1 might need a movement service.

So, I think I know how most of you will answer, but which one would you choose? Thanks!
 
Posts
1,337
Likes
706
I'd like to see the calibres. By the way, do you know how to use the slide rule?
 
Posts
7,901
Likes
35,852
Having owned a vintage 24hr dialled 809 my blunt advice would be to forget it and instead go all out on a top condition 806 navitimer. The 809 in the real world of 'glance at the wrist' time reading was as good as unreadable...especially in the darker winter european months when there are many hours of dim, dusky hours.
 
Posts
543
Likes
694
I'd like to see the calibres. By the way, do you know how to use the slide rule?
Yes, I have asked for movement photos. And I have a general idea of how to use the slide rule, but not perfectly (even though I have an 806 re-edition), but it's on the to-do list!

@cristos71 that is a good point, but since I already have the 806 re-edition, and since I'm charmed by the 24-hour dial, I'm inclined to "risk" it. Do you still have any Navitimer?
Edited:
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,994
As a non-collector of these but a vintage watch guy I would opt for #1. The dial is fresher looking and the case wear doesn’t bother me at all whereas the second one the dial looks a bit tired and the case has lost its crispness. I think #2 was rather sad looking and they gussied it up for sale as best they could.
 
Posts
24,253
Likes
54,006
Having owned a vintage 24hr dialled 809 my blunt advice would be to forget it and instead go all out on a top condition 806 navitimer. The 809 in the real world of 'glance at the wrist' time reading was as good as unreadable...especially in the darker winter european months when there are many hours of dim, dusky hours.
Agree 100%!
 
Posts
2,515
Likes
5,542
Maybe a bit of topic...
But here is also a Navitimer, but the 1806,
and it is huge, around 48 mm i diameter,
so there is no problemo reading the time....😁

This one is untouched with the sharp edges still present.

I would go for the nr 1 809, I think you will be looking at the case and lines on nr 2, and might regret that choice!

 
Posts
543
Likes
694
Got the watch today! Everything looks pretty good, except it's running +30+ seconds/day with a beat error of 4-5ms, even though the seller said that the watch "was checked by our watchmaker to be in excellent functioning and running order." Would you say that this is in "excellent running order"? How soon would you recommend a complete service?
 
Posts
3,951
Likes
11,027
Congratulations on it. I would probably wear it through the weekend and then get it to your watchmaker Monday for a service.
 
Posts
543
Likes
694
Also, do these small bits on the dial look like bits of lume that have flaked off and come to rest atop the dial (and can thus be cleaned relatively easily), or something more "permanent"?