Forums Latest Members

SOLD Vintage First Generation Omega Seamaster Circa 1948

  1. philips Sep 26, 2021

    Posts
    248
    Likes
    345
    While I have not viewed the inside case engravings, as the case design is monocoque, this timepiece appears to be a first generation, late 1940's Omega Seamaster. If you compare this watch to the central seconds version of Omega's recent 70th anniversary Seamaster 1948 Limited Edition, the dial and case design elements are identical. This Seamaster features a 34mm wide steel case, excluding crown, with beefy lugs and bezel. The original two-tone dial shows natural patina and character. The original lume is intact. Caseback is marked "Seamaster", "Waterproof". The crystal was replaced at some point, as was the crown and service history is unknown, but the bumper movement winds smoothly and is keeping reasonable time for a 70+ year-old watch. Comes on a slightly worn generic black leather strap, 18 Long. This is definitely a very wearable vintage watch with lots of life left. US $575, includes shipping/ paypal Canada/US.

    NOTE: Just to clarify, I stand corrected, as indicated by ConElPueblo, that this is a ref. 2767 circa 1954 and is a snapback case. I used Omega's Reference 511.13.38.20.02.001, their recent 1948 re-issue as a reference point, which was a mistake. My intention was not to mislead and I apologize for my poor description. Thanks for all your comments and feedback. I'll do a better job next time.

    DSC02573.JPG DSC02578.JPG DSC02574.JPG DSC02575.JPG DSC02573.JPG DSC02569.JPG DSC02568.JPG DSC02563.JPG
     
    DSC02561.JPG
    Edited Sep 27, 2021
    rbob99, 0uss, Spruce and 5 others like this.
  2. Vanallard Sep 26, 2021

    Posts
    1,405
    Likes
    4,861
    Seamasters dating back to the 40s are quite rare - a claim to own one should be based on seeing the serial number IMO.
     
    TimeODanaos and Zapatta like this.
  3. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Sep 26, 2021

    Posts
    12,205
    Likes
    15,720
    Especially since the earliest Seamasters did not have the model name on the dial.

    upload_2021-9-26_21-41-34.png

    From 1950 Omega Catalog.
    gatorcpa
     
    MtV likes this.
  4. ckhaing Sep 26, 2021

    Posts
    489
    Likes
    2,001
    i think i violated this rule unknowingly- so will delete the message in order to comply

    Keep all communication to through PM in respect to a deal rather than email. You can of course openly discuss the item in question publicly , but not in the sales post . Such discussions are to be respectful and non-accusatory. Serious concerns should be directed in reports to staff.
     
    Edited Sep 28, 2021
  5. BenBagbag Sep 26, 2021

    Posts
    2,820
    Likes
    8,983
    Kind of silly. The caseback should be opened anyways as part of sales listing to begin with.
     
    myatt likes this.
  6. padders Oooo subtitles! Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    8,993
    Likes
    13,941
    Looks like an early-mid 1950s 2767 with a press on back. The dial text looks fine for that era. Are you sure it is a bumper? The later 2846 looks similar too.
     
    Edited Sep 27, 2021
    TimeODanaos likes this.
  7. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    15,491
    Likes
    32,381
    PM sent.
     
  8. MtV Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    3,134
    Likes
    12,126
    A simple, straight picture from the front would also be very helpful.
     
  9. ConElPueblo Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    It's a ref. 2767, so not exactly "first generation". The logo is the later type as well (introduced around 1953 on most Seamasters).

    Lovely facetted fat lugs :thumbsup:


    It is a snap-back, there should be a small lip somewhere around the periphery of the caseback :)
     
    Edited Sep 27, 2021
  10. ckhaing Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    489
    Likes
    2,001
    will submit offer
     
    philips likes this.
  11. TimeODanaos Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    1,568
    Likes
    3,226
    I may have misinterpreted OF rules/etiquette here - I had a lot of questions, but shouldn't a lot of this be via PM? Happy to be taught the house rules - via PM if appropriate (taking my own point) - and with apologies if necessary for using the thread to raise this. Thanks, and peace, to all.
     
    ckhaing, sonicosa and philips like this.
  12. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    15,491
    Likes
    32,381

    Exactly.

     
    sonicosa likes this.
  13. philips Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    248
    Likes
    345
    I really appreciate your feedback, thank you. My intention was not to mislead. As you indicate, this is a ref. 2767 from around 1954 or so. I compared it to Omega's recent 1948 re-issue, which was a mistake.
     
    MtV, gatorcpa and ConElPueblo like this.
  14. ConElPueblo Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,978
    I hope my comment wasn't percieved negatively - I am not surprised it sold fast :)
     
    ckhaing, MtV and philips like this.
  15. philips Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    248
    Likes
    345
    Just to clarify, I stand corrected, as indicated by ConElPueblo, that this is a ref. 2767 circa 1954 and is a snapback case. I used Omega's Reference 511.13.38.20.02.001, their recent 1948 re-issue as a reference point, which was a mistake. My intention was not to mislead. Thanks for all your comments and feedback. I'll do a better job next time.
    No, thanks again for the feedback, you've been very helpful. Moving forward I will do a better job. I made a poor assumption thinking this was late 40's. I've put a note in the listing to clarify.
     
    sonicosa likes this.
  16. MtV Sep 27, 2021

    Posts
    3,134
    Likes
    12,126
    +1 - it's an attractive watch and was offered for a very fair price. Congrats to buyer and seller. :)
     
  17. sleepyastronaut Sep 28, 2021

    Posts
    963
    Likes
    1,228
    I'll have one in 36mm please send thank you. Beautiful piece, congrats to whomever picked it up
     
    ckhaing likes this.