Forums Latest Auctions Members
  1. skipper

    skipper Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    185
    Looking to get my wife a vintage Omega, and really like the look of these smaller (ladies?) size SM 120's, at 31mm I think it will sit very well on her small wrist.

    However, they are like hens teeth, and I'm struggling to find a nice one. There are currently two on ebay, price wise not sure, probably a bit on the steep side (the buy it now one), but seeing as they seem so rare, perhaps that's where it's at right now?

    Anyway, any views, + or - would be greatly appreciated,

    First one, looks nice on first glance, but hands don't look right to me, far too short and no luminous strip, and the bezel inlay looks in suspiciously good shape...

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/omega-La...e=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649

    Second one looks good too, bit pricey perhaps? I don't know, you tell me. Hands look right on this one, and the bezel inlay looks more like I'd expect it to at 50 yrs old. Only the dial lume markers look a bit wrong to me, almost 'fuzzy'...? Thoughts?

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rare-Vin...m=223308594212&_trksid=p2047675.c100009.m1982

    Thanks.
     
  2. efauser

    efauser I ♥ karma!!! Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    7,865
    Likes
    12,831
    Don't be lazy, post photos, not links. Make it easy for those whose help you're asking for.
     
    connieseamaster likes this.
  3. skipper

    skipper Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    185
    I am a complete luddite when it comes to anything IT, but I will take a look on the laptop tomorrow. I'll figure it out somehow, I'm sure.
     
  4. airansun

    airansun Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,764
    Likes
    13,479
    Thirty seconds...

    2C5F7351-10DB-415B-9487-F14BC3E9A241.jpeg 3BF72C57-7BC6-4561-8598-A04A97AC6C6A.jpeg

    The important ones.

    2B2CB420-A5BB-4069-986B-7F8086CCEE5E.jpeg

    Are those hands original?
     
  5. airansun

    airansun Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,764
    Likes
    13,479
    And the second one, which I like better

    D7A4CA96-0FF9-4232-A29E-1072CA098664.jpeg 41906D2A-1668-4228-959B-D0662074A966.jpeg 791DA699-9785-40EF-B009-DE4577DD9049.jpeg
    7AA016BD-6323-4BF8-ADAD-490AB79CE3D3.jpeg

    I’d jump on the second one, but I have no expertise on these.
     
  6. skipper

    skipper Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    185
    Thank you for showing the pics and for your opinion, can you share with my why you prefer it? Is it just the hands, or are there other alarm bells with the first one?
     
  7. OMEGuy

    OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,093
    Likes
    2,702
    Edited Jan 10, 2019
    connieseamaster likes this.
  8. skipper

    skipper Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    185
    Interesting... I didn't think you had to worry so much about fakes with these smaller ladies watches. Every day's a school day, it seems. Thank you.
     
    OMEGuy likes this.
  9. X350 XJR

    X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    9,227
    Likes
    19,118
    And on what basis do you draw this conclusion?
     
  10. OMEGuy

    OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,093
    Likes
    2,702
    On looking at the dial and the case.
     
  11. airansun

    airansun Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,764
    Likes
    13,479
    Well, speaking for myself, the first watch — the parts don’t seem to go together to my eyes. The bezel and hands are big stand outs, but the whole thing seems recently gathered.

    The second watch feels, to me, right. The parts all look like they’ve been together since the outset. It looks more authentic to my eye.

    I am concerned about the lugs on the second watch though.

    Maybe this lesson is that more studying is required before hitting buy it now, at least for me...
     
    Edited Jan 10, 2019
    skipper and KAP like this.
  12. OMEGuy

    OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,093
    Likes
    2,702
    Same with me.
     
    connieseamaster likes this.
  13. airansun

    airansun Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,764
    Likes
    13,479
    Oh, and most importantly:

    We haven’t even seen any movement shots!

    I rarely buy anything without a movement shot.
     
    connieseamaster and KAP like this.
  14. KAP

    KAP Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    232
    Likes
    563
    skipper likes this.
  15. X350 XJR

    X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    9,227
    Likes
    19,118
    How about this one?

    170787-c713e5ba3134edc328863cebfa5df0e2.png 170789-6c2afd14fb2e1d7942a5c357e3fd9423.png
     
    omegasaso12 and ChrisN like this.
  16. airansun

    airansun Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    1,764
    Likes
    13,479
    @X350 XJR :

    ::love::

    Oh, I’d definitely go over $1,000 for that one. Very nice.
     
  17. OMEGuy

    OMEGuy Jan 10, 2019

    Posts
    2,093
    Likes
    2,702
    Edited Jan 10, 2019
  18. skipper

    skipper Jan 11, 2019

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    185
    Thanks for your thoughts, it's early days obviously, so I won't be jumping at the first example I find, and would much rather buy off OF, WUS etc etc, but these aren't a Connie or a Speedy, very few ever seem to come up for sale.

    Anyway, what is the concern with the lugs on the second example? Shape / over polished,or general wear? Or repro case perhaps?
     
  19. ChrisN

    ChrisN Jan 11, 2019

    Posts
    1,899
    Likes
    3,738
    I much prefer the 566.024 as they are somewhat funkier. This looks about right at first glance and I'd expect it to sell. Shame about the dent on the top lug but it's not clear to me if it is significant. Will need a service like all of them, regardless of the advert.

    I'd be tempted if my wife didn't already have this one.

    Cheers, Chris
     
  20. skipper

    skipper Jan 11, 2019

    Posts
    166
    Likes
    185
    Yeah I like that too, very much, very pleasing design. Will add that to my search list.