"Verbal" agreements?

Posts
396
Likes
584
What agreement? You wrote that your brother would arrange to come by and look at the watch in person. So there was no concluded agreement, because you surely would have had to option to withdraw (?) Why should someone have a look at the watch in person, if you had concludind a binding sales contract (written or verbally). A "letter of intent" is, by the way, worth absolutely nothing under European legislation.

If I were a seller and a buyer would tell me that someone would (might?) drop by in a week or so to have a look at a watch, I would prefer any person, who drops by and BUYS in person in the meanwhile.

P.S.: I personally have experienced several time, that a (prospective) buyer asked for my bank account details for payment of what was agreed on (!). Nothing happened though. Now I ask for Paypal payment and as long as the prospective buyer does not pay, nothing is reserved.
In general, this is a totally fair point. However, the viewing was just to serve as confirmation of the condition. So yes, while if something was not as described, I may have wanted to withdraw, to me that doesn't necessarily mean we didn't have an agreement. It just means that the viewing was part of the agreement. And I never said I thought we had a legally binding contract, just an agreement that I was surprised to see a "professional" renege on.

And to clarify more details that you are rightfully probing, there was no "might" drop by. We had already discussed the location and date and were waiting for him to confirm just the time. And it wasn't that someone dropped by in the meantime and bought it. It was that someone also made plans to drop by further into the future who he now preferred since it wouldn't involve any shipping.

And your terms that "nothing is reserved until payment is made" is totally reasonable and perhaps even ideal! But again, that's not what he said in this particular case. When I asked him point blank on the phone if he could consider the watch "on hold" pending the viewing/payment, he said "YES". If he didn't want to honor such a policy, then perhaps my only point at the end of the day is that he should have simply said "NO, that's not a policy I support".

I must not have read the full OP as I agree on a re-read it does sound open to interpretation. I wouldn’t consider someone arranging a viewing as an agreed deal.

That said, if the seller agreed to putting the watch on hold pending a viewing, that should’ve been adhered to. The seller would have been perfectly within their rights not to agree to this, but if they have, they should stick to it.
Exactly.

Well, the transaction in question appears to have been troubled anyway, just think about all the "terms" and "term adjustments" (what might they have been?). The seller might just as well be regarded as rather patient as long as we do not hear the other side ... :cool:

When I (European) bought my Elgin Veritas in the USA, we had a few emails back and forth (mainly with respect to the provenience, see elsewhere here), then I paid the full amount, and finally he sent the watch. That was it. No specific "terms", no prior inspections through third parties, etc.
PS by "terms", I just meant what I already alluded to: 1) the price, 2) the shipping method/cost and who would pay, 3) the insurance method/cost and who would pay, 4) whether or not he accepted returns for any reason, 5) whether or not anything was warrantied, and 6) the viewing (just because my brother happened to live in the same city). I guess I consider these pretty standard, but I'd be curious to know if they are not? By term "adjustments", I just meant that since the shipping apparently ended up being more of a sticking point for him than he indicated during our initial discussions, I suggested that I would be willing to cover part of the shipping costs, in order to save the deal.

FWIW, I've also been on the selling side where I told a prospective buyer that I had a competing offer come in while we were still finalizing our terms, at which point he told me that he thought our terms were already finalized and had his lawyer dad look at our communications and agree that we already had a legally binding contract and started talking about damages for breach of contract! So perhaps I am more sensitive to these types of issues than most!
 
Posts
4,912
Likes
17,123
... who even told me when I asked ...that he would put the watch on hold for me...

Legal contract? No

Character test? Yes

You should feel free to leave a review in the OF seller review thread and name the seller. Just state the facts and let others decide for themselves. Me, I would appreciate the forewarning.
Edited:
 
Posts
148
Likes
446
Re: enforcing, oh for sure! Re: dealers vs. private sellers, I see what you mean, and I would think that private sellers on a forum like OF would be more honorable. But on Chrono24, it seems like there is a higher level of "anonymity", and perhaps I'm naive in thinking that there are more dealers out there who still care about reputation.
The issue with C24 is there is no way to rate Private Sellers, or repeat private sellers. If a private seller rips somebody off, there’s no way to communicate that, and worse they can create a new account and continue the game. Dealers aren’t so lucky, C24 really treats them more harshly.
 
Posts
604
Likes
1,983
PS by "terms", I just meant what I already alluded to: 1) the price, 2) the shipping method/cost and who would pay, 3) the insurance method/cost and who would pay, 4) whether or not he accepted returns for any reason, 5) whether or not anything was warrantied, and 6) the viewing (just because my brother happened to live in the same city).
Just as a sidenote.

Ad 3) If the seller is a professional (and I assume this since you refer to a website and business) and the buyer a private person, then responsibility ends under European legislation after it is delivered to you. Insurance etc. is a matter of the seller and if the item is lost or damaged by the carrier, the seller has the loss and the seller must claim refund from the carrier.

Ad 4) If the seller is a professional and the buyer a private person, European legislation provides a 14 days (after receiving at your end) return right, even without cause by the way. It is illegal to exclude this right of return. I believe that US legislation has a similar instrument, called "cooling off period".

Ad 5) If the seller is a professional and the buyer a private person, the seller cannot exclude warranties by law, except if the sale is a commission sale for a a private seller. If the seller is the owner of the item, this is not a commission sale.

So, 3) to 5) are terms provided by binding law in Europe and consequently need no negotiations. Assuming that you are a private buyer and the seller a professional. If one of these conditions is not met, the aforementioned provisions do not apply.
 
Posts
396
Likes
584
Just as a sidenote.

Ad 3) If the seller is a professional (and I assume this since you refer to a website and business) and the buyer a private person, then responsibility ends under European legislation after it is delivered to you. Insurance etc. is a matter of the seller and if the item is lost or damaged by the carrier, the seller has the loss and the seller must claim refund from the carrier.

Ad 4) If the seller is a professional and the buyer a private person, European legislation provides a 14 days (after receiving at your end) return right, even without cause by the way. It is illegal to exclude this right of return. I believe that US legislation has a similar instrument, called "cooling off period".

Ad 5) If the seller is a professional and the buyer a private person, the seller cannot exclude warranties by law, except if the sale is a commission sale for a a private seller. If the seller is the owner of the item, this is not a commission sale.

So, 3) to 5) are terms provided by binding law in Europe and consequently need no negotiations. Assuming that you are a private buyer and the seller a professional. If one of these conditions is not met, the aforementioned provisions do not apply.
Oh wow I didn't know all of this. And whether or not the U.S. has similar laws between U.S. buyers/sellers, all of this holds true between a European (business) seller and a U.S. (private) buyer?
 
Posts
604
Likes
1,983
all of this holds true between a European (business) seller and a U.S. (private) buyer?
Lawyer´s answer: depends 😁.

In principle yes, but an EU business seller can exclude mandatory rights provided by EU law to EU consumers (= private buyers) in case of non-EU consumers, e.g. in his general terms and conditions of business. Rarely seen in case of small businesses though.
 
Posts
5,437
Likes
8,469
Legal contract? No

Character test? Yes

You should feel free to leave a review in the OF seller review thread and name the seller. Just state the facts and let others decide for themselves. Me, I would appreciate the forewarning.
This
- and @watch_my_six , I would personally name and shame in this thread, so long as you are accurate with your recounting of the situation there can be no case for defamation.

English contract law is simple:
offer, acceptance, consideration

without all three there is no contract.

Of course there is always a case for an implied contract but even if you could prove the case (unlikely here in the UK) you would have to prove loss - and I'm pretty sure that the potential future enjoyment of a watch you never had would not count as loss.

Other countries (like across the pond) are famously more litigious and perhaps disappointment is actionable in those countries.

All in all a very poor show by the seller - and given that we have all experienced the excitement of buying a new watch, it is entirely understandable that you are peeved about the whole affair - but other than 'outing' the culprit to warn others I don't see any other recourse.
 
Posts
396
Likes
584
This
- and @watch_my_six , I would personally name and shame in this thread, so long as you are accurate with your recounting of the situation there can be no case for defamation.

English contract law is simple:
offer, acceptance, consideration

without all three there is no contract.

Of course there is always a case for an implied contract but even if you could prove the case (unlikely here in the UK) you would have to prove loss - and I'm pretty sure that the potential future enjoyment of a watch you never had would not count as loss.

Other countries (like across the pond) are famously more litigious and perhaps disappointment is actionable in those countries.

All in all a very poor show by the seller - and given that we have all experienced the excitement of buying a new watch, it is entirely understandable that you are peeved about the whole affair - but other than 'outing' the culprit to warn others I don't see any other recourse.
Oh yeah I wasn't looking for recourse, just to vent/share : )
Lawyer´s answer: depends 😁.

In principle yes, but an EU business seller can exclude mandatory rights provided by EU law to EU consumers (= private buyers) in case of non-EU consumers, e.g. in his general terms and conditions of business. Rarely seen in case of small businesses though.
So then perhaps it is still worth confirming during "negotiations"? ; )
 
Posts
604
Likes
1,983
Oh yeah I wasn't looking for recourse, just to vent/share : )

So then perhaps it is still worth confirming during "negotiations"? ; )
Au contraire. Read the business terms (if any, they need to be published on the website). And if EU law is not explicitely excluded therein (or alternative provisions are made for non-EU residents), then simply keep silent ... 😎
 
Posts
619
Likes
2,255
Legal contract? No

Character test? Yes
This sums this situation up for me, and I recently had a similar experience with a seller on OF. I made an offer via PM, the seller accepted it, and asked for my payment/shipping preference. I responded to his message within 7 minutes. He then said he got a full offer from someone else during that time and even accepted a small deposit. Definitely not professional since he clearly agreed to a deal in writing with me and broke it for more money, but I didn't think it was worth making a stink about so I moved on. I would never do any business with him.
 
Posts
20,058
Likes
46,686
In the big picture, this is such a minor issue compared to the things that some buyers and sellers do. Complaining about a "broken deal" when no money, service, or item was even exchanged feels pretty whiny. I can't even count the number of times that sellers reneged on deals after I won an auction on eBay and other platforms, and made payment. I would move on without a thought.