Forums Latest Auctions Members
  1. gouverneur

    gouverneur Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    20
    Likes
    10
    Has anyone ever seen a 145.005-67 Seamaster cal. 321 with this type of dial before?

    The website selling it is here:

    http://www.finertimes.com/asp/watches/buyitnow.asp?Where=(Ref='rxvi0516')&Step=1

    I have never, and compounding my confusion, there appears to be another vintage model with a very different case but the same dial and hands. I wonder if the one with the more standard case (on the website) is perhaps a combination of another watch's dial/hands with a 145.005 case?

    Would appreciate the forum wisdom on this one, thanks!
     
    rxvi0516.jpg Images_Watches_OMEGA_559_Thumb.jpg
    fskywalker likes this.
  2. DON

    DON Oct 29, 2015

    Posts
    796
    Likes
    450
    The second is not the same design. I would classify it as part of the Speedmaster companion line I named back in 2003 because of some time only models with Speedmaster like dial designs (there were also a couple of Seamaster 300 models also).

    Here's one that I owned. Although yours is a chrono. it still have some of the Speedmaster attributes. Mainly the indexes and double dots at 12:00

    [​IMG]

    DON
     
    Mac5, Giff2577, Foo2rama and 2 others like this.
  3. toddle321

    toddle321 Oct 30, 2015

    Posts
    739
    Likes
    2,499
    image.png
    fskywalker likes this.
  4. oddboy

    oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Oct 30, 2015

    Posts
    9,092
    Likes
    22,889
    That one has on TZ for quite some time. The seller seems like a decent guy and I believe his description after chatting with him.

    It's a nic looking little seamaster, though there are issues that he discloses.

    I have almost bought it several times, but then..... ooooh, something shiney!
     
    fskywalker likes this.
  5. Giff2577

    Giff2577 Quick with the tools! Oct 30, 2015

    Posts
    932
    Likes
    3,695
  6. Drawarms

    Drawarms Apr 2, 2016

    Posts
    1,780
    Likes
    1,465
    Anyone have any more information about this dial?
     
  7. Giff2577

    Giff2577 Quick with the tools! Apr 2, 2016

    Posts
    932
    Likes
    3,695
    From AJTT:
    image.jpeg
    This is the same as the second photo with the cushion case 145.006. I don't have I formation on the 145.005.
     
    fskywalker and Mods like this.
  8. Kwijibo

    Kwijibo Apr 2, 2016

    Posts
    1,609
    Likes
    1,596
    The weird thing is the applied logo that looks more than 68/69 which would match a 361. Neve saw this before.
     
    Edited Apr 2, 2016
  9. efauser

    efauser I ♥ karma!!! Apr 2, 2016

    Posts
    7,915
    Likes
    12,949
    Which is the proper case? 145.005 or 006?
     
  10. Kwijibo

    Kwijibo Apr 2, 2016

    Posts
    1,609
    Likes
    1,596
    sorry just edited... I have no answer... it does not like a franken. Why cas a 321 in a later case. It meaningless.
     
    Edited Apr 2, 2016
    Charles@UW likes this.
  11. oddboy

    oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Apr 2, 2016

    Posts
    9,092
    Likes
    22,889
  12. kyle L

    kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Apr 9, 2016

    Posts
    4,107
    Likes
    10,032
    Another one:

    image.jpeg
     
    kov, Taybharr, robocaspar and 6 others like this.
  13. fskywalker

    fskywalker Nov 3, 2016

    Posts
    2,683
    Likes
    5,391
    Very nice dial
     
  14. Passover

    Passover May 1, 2020

    Posts
    1,142
    Likes
    1,315
    Another example surfaced but condition is not so good (wrong chrono hand and crown and one pusher)

    @kov DIBS on yours ;)



    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    Dero13 likes this.